Evaluation of MDE tools from a metamodeling perspective

被引:9
作者
Saraiva, Joao de Sousa
da Silva, Alberto Rodrigues
机构
[1] INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico
[2] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Technical University of Lisbon (IST/UTL), Lisbon
关键词
CASE tools; evaluation; meta model; modeling languages; MDE;
D O I
10.4018/jdm.2008100102
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ever since the introduction of computers into society, researchers have been trying to raise the abstraction level at which we build software programs. We are currently adopting an abstraction level based on graphical models instead of source code: MDE. MDE is the driving force for some recent modeling languages and approachess, such as OMG,s UML or Domain-Specific Modeling. All these approaches are founded on metamodeling: definin languages that represent a problem-domain. A key factor for the success of any approach is appropriate tool support. However, only recently have tool creators started considering metamodeling as an important issue in their list of concerns. In this paper, we evaluate a small set of MDE tools from the perspective of the metamodeling activity, focusing on both architectural and practical aspects. Then, using the results of this evaluation, we discuss open research issues for MDE-based software development tools.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 46
页数:26
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Atkinson C, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3713, P398, DOI 10.1007/11557432_30
[2]   Model-driven development:: A metamodeling foundation [J].
Atkinson, C ;
Kühne, T .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2003, 20 (05) :36-+
[3]  
BOOCH G, 2004, BUSINESS PROCESS MAY
[4]  
Fong C.K., 2007, SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENT
[5]   Model-driven development using UML 2.0: Promises and pitfalls [J].
France, RB ;
Ghosh, S ;
Dinh-Trong, T ;
Solberg, A .
COMPUTER, 2006, 39 (02) :59-+
[6]  
HENDERSONSELLER.B, 2005, SOFTWARE SYSTEM MODE, V4, P4, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10270-004-0076-8
[7]  
Kelly S., 2008, Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation
[8]  
Kleppe A. G., 2003, MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise
[9]  
*MET, MET COM COMM SIT MET
[10]  
*METACASE, METACASE DOM SPEC MO