Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany

被引:567
作者
Kabisch, Nadja [1 ,2 ]
Haase, Dagmar [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Geog, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Urban green space provisioning; User preferences; Socio-environmental justice; Berlin; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PARKS; TREES; FORM; ENVIRONMENT; INDICATORS; VEGETATION; HEALTH; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Urban green spaces (UGS) have been shown to provide a number of environmental and social benefits relevant for a higher quality of life of residents. However, population growth in cities combined with urban planning policies of (re)densification can drive the conversion of UGS into residential land. This development might result in an unequal distribution of UGS in a city. We present an analysis of UGS provisioning in Berlin, Germany in order to identify distributional inequities between UGS and population which are further discussed in light of variations in user preferences associated with demographics and immigrant status. Publicly available land use and sociodemographic data at sub-district level are applied in a GIS, dissimilarity index and cluster analysis approach. Results show that although most areas are supplied with more UGS compared to the per capita target value of 6 m(2), there is considerable dissimilarity by immigrant status and age. To address rising concerns about socio-environmental justice in cities and to evaluate the (dis)advantages of applying UGS threshold values for urban planning, visitor profiles and preferences of a site-specific case, the park and former city airport Berlin-Tempelhof are analyzed. Results from questionnaire surveys indicate that the identified dissimilarities on sub-district level are not the same as socio-environmental injustice in Tempelhof, but point to a mismatch of UGS and user preferences. In addition to evaluating UGS distribution, the match between quality of a park and specific cultural and age dependent user needs should be considered for successful green infrastructure planning rather than focusing on target values. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 139
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]   Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: Where to intervene? [J].
Dai, Dajun .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2011, 102 (04) :234-244
[12]   Green infrastructure and bird diversity across an urban socioeconomic gradient [J].
Davis, Amelie Y. ;
Belaire, J. Amy ;
Farfan, Monica A. ;
Milz, Dan ;
Sweeney, Eric R. ;
Loss, Scott R. ;
Minor, Emily S. .
ECOSPHERE, 2012, 3 (11)
[13]   Natural environments - healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health [J].
de Vries, S ;
Verheij, RA ;
Groenewegen, PP ;
Spreeuwenberg, P .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 2003, 35 (10) :1717-1731
[14]  
Downey L., 2009, NIH PUBLIC ACCESS, V51, P759, DOI DOI 10.1525/S0P.2008.51.4.759.RACE
[16]  
Flasbarth J., 2011, ENV JUSTICE, P7
[17]   Outdoor recreation and ethnicity in Europe-A review [J].
Gentin, Sandra .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2011, 10 (03) :153-161
[18]   Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a geographical information system (GIS) approach for urban forestry research [J].
Germann-Chiari, C ;
Seeland, K .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2004, 6 (01) :3-13
[19]  
Gill SE., 2007, Built Environment, V33, P115, DOI [DOI 10.2148/BENV.33.1.115, 10.2148/benv.33.1.115]
[20]   Urban parks as green walls or green magnets? Interracial relations in neighborhood boundary parks [J].
Gobster, PH .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1998, 41 (01) :43-55