Emergency cervical cerclage: effect on pregnancy outcome and mode of delivery

被引:20
作者
Cavus, Yunus [1 ]
Uysal, Ahmet [2 ,3 ]
Balsak, Deniz [1 ]
Acar, Zuat [1 ]
Ince, Zehra [1 ]
Uysal, Fatma [4 ]
机构
[1] MH Diyarbakir Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[2] MH Seferihisar Necat Hepkon State Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Canakkale, Turkey
[4] Konak Matern Hosp, Dept Radiol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Chorioamnionitis; delivery type; emergency cervical cerclage; rescue cerclage; PROGESTERONE; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; GESTATION; LENGTH;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2013.805196
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of emergency cervical cerclage (ECC) and its effect on the mode of delivery. Patients and methods: Between April 2007 and July 2011 patients attending MH Diyarbakir Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital and MH Seferihisar State Necat Hepkon Hospital who underwent ECC were included in this retrospective analysis. Results: At the time of ECC, the mean gestational age, cervical length and cervical dilatation were 21.4 +/- 2.2 weeks, 4.3 +/- 0.8 cm and 11 +/- 2.4 mm, respectively. The average time between the procedure and birth was 13.8 +/- 4.9 weeks and this period was sufficient to maintain a viable pregnancy (p < 0.05). In this study, 12 patients (60%) were delivered vaginally and eight (40%) patients delivered with CS (40%). the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.371). Regarding the gestational age at time of delivery, 55% of patients delivered at 36 weeks, 70% at 32 weeks, and 80% of them delivered at 28 weeks. The total live birth rate was 90%. Conclusion: ECC provides satisfactory time for the fetus to gain sufficient viability. Pregnancies with emergency cerclage show no difference in terms of birth method, whether cesarean or vaginal birth, and delivery type does not appears to be linked to ECC.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 83
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The effect of second trimester emergency cervical cerclage on perinatal outcome [J].
Abo-Yaqoub, Salwa ;
Mohammed, Abdel-Baset F. ;
Saleh, Huda .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (09) :1746-1749
[2]   Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy [J].
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Stampalija, Tamara ;
Medley, Nancy .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (06)
[3]   Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: Emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone [J].
Althuisius, SM ;
Dekker, GA ;
Hummel, P ;
van Geijn, HP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) :907-910
[4]   Emergency cervical cerclage after 20 weeks' gestation: A retrospective study of 6 years' practice in 34 cases [J].
Benifla, JL ;
Goffinet, F ;
Darai, E ;
Proust, A ;
DeCrepy, A ;
Madelenat, P .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 1997, 12 (05) :274-278
[5]   Universal cervical-length screening and vaginal progesterone prevents early preterm births, reduces neonatal morbidity and is cost saving: doing nothing is no longer an option [J].
Campbell, Stuart .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 38 (01) :1-9
[6]   Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes [J].
Daskalakis, George ;
Papantoniou, Nikolaos ;
Mesogitis, Spiros ;
Antsaklis, Aris .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (02) :221-226
[7]   Contemporary Use of Cerclage in Pregnancy [J].
Debbs, Robert H. ;
Chen, Janine .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 52 (04) :597-610
[8]  
Dodd JM, 2009, INT J WOMENS HEALTH, V1, P73
[9]   Emergency cervical cerclage: Predictors of success [J].
Gupta, Manish ;
Emary, Kate ;
Impey, Lawrence .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (07) :670-674
[10]  
Hager J.H., 2003, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, V48, P1091