Equal Efficacy of Endoscopic and Surgical Cystogastrostomy for Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage in a Randomized Trial

被引:375
作者
Varadarajulu, Shyam [1 ]
Bang, Ji Young [1 ]
Sutton, Bryce S. [2 ]
Trevino, Jessica M. [1 ]
Christein, John D. [3 ]
Wilcox, C. Mel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] James A Haley Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Excellence, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
Clinical Trial; Pancreas; Biliary Tract Obstruction; Comparison; PERIPANCREATIC FLUID COLLECTIONS; GUIDED TRANSMURAL DRAINAGE; COST DATA; MANAGEMENT; EUS; CLASSIFICATION; DISRUPTION; OUTCOMES; SF-36;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although surgery is the standard technique for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, use of endoscopic methods is increasing. We performed a single-center, open-label, randomized trial to compare endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic pseudocysts underwent endoscopic (n = 20) or surgical cystogastrostomy (n = 20). The primary end point was pseudocyst recurrence after a 24-month follow-up period. Secondary end points were treatment success or failure, complications, re-interventions, length of hospital stay, physical and mental health scores, and total costs. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period, none of the patients who received endoscopic therapy had a pseudocyst recurrence, compared with 1 patient treated surgically. There were no differences in treatment successes, complications, or re-interventions between the groups. However, the length of hospital stay was shorter for patients who underwent endoscopic cystogastrostomy (median, 2 days, vs 6 days in the surgery group; P < .001). Although there were no differences in physical component scores and mental health component scores (MCS) between groups at baseline on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Survey questionnaire, longitudinal analysis showed significantly better physical component scores (P = .019) and mental health component scores (P = .025) for the endoscopy treatment group. The total mean cost was lower for patients managed by endoscopy than surgery ($7011 vs $15,052; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage, none of the patients in the endoscopy group had pseudocyst recurrence during the follow-up period, therefore there is no evidence that surgical cystogastrostomy is superior. However, endoscopic treatment was associated with shorter hospital stays, better physical and mental health of patients, and lower cost. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00826501.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Single-Step EUS-Guided Transmural Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts: Analysis of Technical Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety [J].
Ahn, Ji Yong ;
Seo, Dong Wan ;
Eum, Junbum ;
Song, Tae Jun ;
Moon, Sung-Hoon ;
Park, Do Hyun ;
Lee, Sang Soo ;
Lee, Sung Koo ;
Kim, Myung-Hwan .
GUT AND LIVER, 2010, 4 (04) :524-529
[2]   Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of simple and complicated pancreatic pseudocysts [J].
Antillon, MR ;
Shah, RJ ;
Stiegmann, G ;
Chen, YK .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (06) :797-803
[3]   Pancreatic-fluid collections:: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage [J].
Arvanitakis, Marianna ;
Delhaye, Myriam ;
Bali, Maria Antonietta ;
Matos, Celso ;
De Maertelaer, Viviane ;
Le Moine, Olivier ;
Deviere, Jacques .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (04) :609-619
[4]   Wire-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage by using a modified needle knife and therapeutic echoendoscope [J].
Azar, RR ;
Oh, YS ;
Janec, EM ;
Early, DS ;
Jonnalagadda, SS ;
Edmundowicz, SA .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) :688-692
[5]   Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus [J].
Banks, Peter A. ;
Bollen, Thomas L. ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Gooszen, Hein G. ;
Johnson, Colin D. ;
Sarr, Michael G. ;
Tsiotos, Gregory G. ;
Vege, Santhi Swaroop .
GUT, 2013, 62 (01) :102-111
[6]  
Barber JA, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P3219, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3219::AID-SIM623>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-P
[8]   Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts [J].
Baron, TH ;
Harewood, GC ;
Morgan, DE ;
Yates, MR .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (01) :7-17
[9]   Operative and nonoperative management of pancreatic pseudocysts [J].
Bergman, Simon ;
Melvin, W. Scott .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 87 (06) :1447-+
[10]   TRANSPAPILLARY AND TRANSMURAL DRAINAGE OF PANCREATIC PSEUDOCYSTS [J].
BINMOELLER, KF ;
SEIFERT, H ;
WALTER, A ;
SOEHENDRA, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 42 (03) :219-224