Resident impression management within feedback conversations: A qualitative study

被引:39
作者
Huffman, Brandon M. [1 ]
Hafferty, Frederic W. [2 ]
Bhagra, Anjali [3 ]
Leasure, Emily L. [4 ]
Santivasi, Wil L. [5 ]
Sawatsky, Adam P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Program Professionalism & Values, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Gen Internal Med, Gonda 17, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Community Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Hosp & Palliat Med, Rochester, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE; PERFORMANCE; LEARNERS; COACHES;
D O I
10.1111/medu.14360
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction Medical education is moving to conceptualise feedback as a bidirectional learning conversation. Within this conversation, learners experience a tension between assessment and feedback. That perceived tension affects learners' outward performances. In this study, we aimed to characterise residents' experiences with this tension and its effect on learner authenticity within feedback conversations. Methods In this constructivist grounded theory study, the authors were informed by Goffman's theory of impression management. During data analysis, Dweck's theory of mindset was adopted. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 internal medicine residents. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively, using constant comparison to identify themes coinciding with impression management and mindset, ultimately developing a theoretical model to help explain residents' responses to tensions within feedback conversations. Results Residents constantly felt 'scrutinized', and this affected their engagement in feedback conversations. They staged a performance within those conversations, linked to their underlying mindset: growth or fixed. Growth mindset was characterised by a focus on development as a physician and was associated with asking questions and seeking opportunities for growth. Fixed mindset was characterised by a focus on achieving a favourable evaluation and was associated with a hesitation to ask questions when faced with uncertainty and admit opportunities for growth, because they were concerned about impression management. Context influenced mindset and impression management. Residents adopted a fixed mindset and managed impressions when they perceived the permanence or consequences of evaluations within feedback. Residents adopted a growth mindset when they trusted the supervisor. Discussion Residents assess the context of feedback conversations, altering the authenticity of their behaviours. Context, including the perceptions of formal assessment and relationships with supervisors, affected residents' mindset and impression management. Providing space for relationship-building and clarifying the purpose and structure of assessment may be helpful in supporting effective learning conversations in graduate medical education.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 274
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ACAD MED
[3]  
Archer J, 2013, OXFORD TXB MED ED, P564
[4]   State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback [J].
Archer, Julian C. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (01) :101-108
[5]   Fostering a Feedback Mindset: A Qualitative Exploration of Medical Students' Feedback Experiences With Longitudinal Coaches [J].
Bakke, Brian M. ;
Sheu, Leslie ;
Hauer, Karen E. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2020, 95 (07) :1057-1065
[6]   The Art (and Artifice) of Seeking Feedback: Clerkship Students' Approaches to Asking for Feedback [J].
Bing-You, Robert ;
Hayes, Victoria ;
Palka, Tamara ;
Ford, Marybeth ;
Trowbridge, Robert .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (08) :1218-1226
[7]   Feedback for Learners in Medical Education: What Is Known? A Scoping Review [J].
Bing-You, Robert ;
Hayes, Victoria ;
Varaklis, Kalli ;
Trowbridge, Robert ;
Kemp, Heather ;
McKelvy, Dina .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2017, 92 (09) :1346-1354
[8]   Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility [J].
BingYou, RG ;
Paterson, J ;
Levine, MA .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 1997, 19 (01) :40-44
[9]   Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships [J].
Bok, Harold G. J. ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Spruijt, Annemarie ;
Fokkema, Joanne P. I. ;
van Beukelen, Peter ;
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 47 (03) :282-291
[10]  
Branfield Day L, 2020, ACAD MED