Humoral Immune Response to Avian Influenza Vaccination Over a Six-Month Period in Different Species of Captive Wild Birds

被引:14
作者
Furger, Maria [1 ]
Hoop, Richard [2 ]
Steinmetz, Hanspeter [1 ]
Eulenberger, Ulrike [1 ]
Hatt, Jean-Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Clin Zoo Anim Exot Pets & Wildlife, Vetsuisse Fac, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Div Poultry & Rabbit Dis, Vetsuisse Fac, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
antibody titer; avian influenza; serology; vaccination; zoo;
D O I
10.1637/8111-091707-Reg.1
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
In December 2005, the four major Swiss zoos carried out the vaccination of selected zoo birds with the adjuvant inactivated vaccine H5N2 Nobilis influenza. Pre- and post-vaccination antibody titers were determined either by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test (non-Galliformes) or by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Galliformes) at Week 0, 5, 10, and 26 (Day 0-1, 35-36, 70-71, and 182 respectively) to determine the humoral immune response to H5 antigen. After the first vaccination, the overall geometric mean titer of non-Galliformes was 65 (n = 142), which increased to 187 (n = 139) after booster vaccination and dropped to 74 (n = 65) six months after first vaccination. For the Galliformes group, the mean titers were found to be 2.09 at Week 5 (n = 119), 3.24 at Week 10 (n = 113), and 1.20 at Week 26 (n = 39). Within the non-Galliformes, significant differences in geometric mean titers were found among different species representatives. In general, the flamingos (Phoenicopteriformes) showed a strong response to vaccination, reaching a geometric mean titer of 659 at Week 10, while the Sphenisciformes did not show high antibody titers even after booster vaccination, reaching a maximum geometric mean titer of only 65. Based on the antibody titer profiles of all investigated species, we recommend at least annual revaccination for the species that we investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 228
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Serological response to vaccination against avian influenza in zoo-birds using an inactivated H5N9 vaccine [J].
Bertelsen, Mads F. ;
Klausen, Joan ;
Holm, Elisabeth ;
Grondahl, Carsten ;
Jorgensen, Poul H. .
VACCINE, 2007, 25 (22) :4345-4349
[2]   Increased resistance of vaccinated turkeys to experimental infection with an H7N3 low-pathogenicity avian influenza virus [J].
Capua, I ;
Terregino, C ;
Cattoli, G ;
Toffan, A .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2004, 33 (02) :158-163
[3]   The use of vaccination as an option for the control of avian influenza [J].
Capua, I ;
Marangon, S .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2003, 32 (04) :335-343
[4]   Avian influenza A (H5N1) [J].
de Jong, MD ;
Hien, TT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2006, 35 (01) :2-13
[5]  
*EFSA, 2007, EFSA J, V450, P1
[6]   Vaccination of chickens against H5N1 avian influenza in the face of an outbreak interrupts virus transmission [J].
Ellis, TM ;
Leung, CYHC ;
Chow, MKW ;
Bissett, LA ;
Wong, W ;
Guan, Y ;
Peiris, JSM .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2004, 33 (04) :405-412
[7]  
FLINT S., 2004, Principles of Virology: Molecular Biology, Pathogenesis, and Control of Animal Viruses
[8]   Characterization of a novel influenza a virus hemagglutinin subtype (H16) obtained from black-headed gulls [J].
Fouchier, RAM ;
Munster, V ;
Wallensten, A ;
Bestebroer, TM ;
Herfst, S ;
Smith, D ;
Rimmelzwaan, GF ;
Olsen, B ;
Osterhaus, ADME .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2005, 79 (05) :2814-2822
[9]  
*IDEXX LAB, 2005, LIV POULTR
[10]  
Jordan F. T. W., 2001, POULTRY DIS