Peak energy of the prompt emission of long gamma-ray bursts versus their fluence and peak flux

被引:74
作者
Nava, L. [1 ,2 ]
Ghirlanda, G. [1 ]
Ghisellini, G. [1 ]
Firmani, C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Osserv Astron Brera, I-23807 Merate, Italy
[2] Univ Insubria, Dipartimento Matemat & Fis, I-22100 Como, Italy
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Astron, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
关键词
radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; gamma-rays: bursts; X-rays: general;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13758.x
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The spectral-energy (and luminosity) correlations in long gamma-ray bursts are being hotly debated to establish, first of all, their reality against possible selection effects. These are best studied in the observer planes, namely the peak energy E-peak(obs) versus the fluence F or the peak flux P. In a recent paper, we have started to investigate this problem considering all bursts with known redshift and spectral properties. Here, we consider instead all bursts with known E-peak(obs), irrespective of redshift, adding to those a sample of 100 faint BATSE bursts representative of a larger population of 1000 objects. This allows us to construct a complete, fluence-limited, sample, tailored to study the selection/instrumental effects we consider. We found that the fainter BATSE bursts have smaller E-peak(obs) than those of bright events. As a consequence, the E-peak(obs) of these bursts is correlated with the fluence, though with a slope flatter than that defined by bursts with z. Selection effects, which are present, are shown not to be responsible for the existence of such a correlation. About six per cent of these bursts are surely outliers of the E-peak-E-iso correlation (updated in this paper to include 83 bursts), since they are inconsistent with it for any redshift. E-peak(obs) also correlates with the peak flux, with a slope similar to the E-peak-L-iso correlation. In this case, there is only one sure outlier. The scatter of the E-peak(obs) P correlation defined by the BATSE bursts of our sample is significantly smaller than the E-peak(obs)-F correlation of the same bursts, while for the bursts with known redshift the E-peak-E-iso correlation is tighter than the E-peak-L-iso one. Once a very large number of bursts with E-peak(obs) and redshift will be available, we thus expect that the E-peak-L-iso correlation will be similar to that currently found, whereas it is very likely that the E-peak-E-iso correlation will become flatter and with a larger scatter.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 652
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Bursts with known redshifts [J].
Amati, L ;
Frontera, F ;
Tavani, M ;
in't Zand, JJM ;
Antonelli, A ;
Costa, E ;
Feroci, M ;
Guidorzi, C ;
Heise, J ;
Masetti, N ;
Montanari, E ;
Nicastro, L ;
Palazzi, E ;
Pian, E ;
Piro, L ;
Soffitta, P .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2002, 390 (01) :81-89
[2]   The Ep,i-Eiso correlation in gamma-ray bursts:: updated observational status, re-analysis and main implications [J].
Amati, Lorenzo .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 372 (01) :233-245
[3]   HETE-2 observation of two gamma-ray bursts at z>3 [J].
Atteia, JL ;
Kawai, N ;
Vanderspek, R ;
Pizzichini, G ;
Ricker, GR ;
Barraud, C ;
Boer, M ;
Braga, J ;
Butler, N ;
Cline, T ;
Crew, GB ;
Dezalay, JP ;
Donaghy, TQ ;
Doty, J ;
Fenimore, EE ;
Galassi, M ;
Graziani, C ;
Hurley, K ;
Jernigan, JG ;
Lamb, DQ ;
Levine, A ;
Manchanda, R ;
Martel, F ;
Matsuoka, M ;
Morgan, E ;
Nakagawa, Y ;
Olive, JF ;
Prigozhin, G ;
Sakamoto, T ;
Sato, R ;
Shirasaki, Y ;
Suzuki, M ;
Takagishi, K ;
Tamagawa, T ;
Torii, K ;
Villasenor, J ;
Woosley, SE ;
Yamauchi, M ;
Yoshida, A .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 626 (01) :292-297
[4]   BATSE OBSERVATIONS OF GAMMA-RAY BURST SPECTRA .1. SPECTRAL DIVERSITY [J].
BAND, D ;
MATTESON, J ;
FORD, L ;
SCHAEFER, B ;
PALMER, D ;
TEEGARDEN, B ;
CLINE, T ;
BRIGGS, M ;
PACIESAS, W ;
PENDLETON, G ;
FISHMAN, G ;
KOUVELIOTOU, C ;
MEEGAN, C ;
WILSON, R ;
LESTRADE, P .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 413 (01) :281-292
[5]   Testing the gamma-ray burst energy relationships [J].
Band, DL ;
Preece, RD .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 627 (01) :319-323
[6]   Comparison of the gamma-ray burst sensitivity of different detectors [J].
Band, DL .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 588 (02) :945-951
[7]  
Barbier L., 2006, GCN, P4518
[8]   Spectral analysis of 35 GRBs/XRFs observed with HETE-2/FREGATE [J].
Barraud, C ;
Olive, JF ;
Lestrade, JP ;
Atteia, JL ;
Hurley, K ;
Ricker, G ;
Lamb, DQ ;
Kawai, N ;
Boer, M ;
Dezalay, JP ;
Pizzichini, G ;
Vanderspek, R ;
Crew, G ;
Doty, J ;
Monnelly, G ;
Villasenor, J ;
Butler, N ;
Levine, A ;
Yoshida, A ;
Shirasaki, Y ;
Sakamoto, T ;
Tamagawa, T ;
Torii, K ;
Matsuoka, M ;
Fenimore, EE ;
Galassi, A ;
Tavenner, T ;
Donaghy, TQ ;
Graziani, C ;
Jernigan, JG .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2003, 400 (03) :1021-1030
[9]  
BARTHELMY S, 2006, GCN CIRC, P5107
[10]   Swift panchromatic observations of the bright gamma-ray burst GRB 050525a [J].
Blustin, AJ ;
Band, D ;
Barthelmy, S ;
Boyd, P ;
Capalbi, M ;
Holland, ST ;
Marshall, FE ;
Mason, KO ;
Perri, M ;
Poole, T ;
Roming, P ;
Rosen, S ;
Schady, P ;
Still, M ;
Zhang, B ;
Angelini, L ;
Barbier, L ;
Beardmore, A ;
Breeveld, A ;
Burrows, DN ;
Cummings, JR ;
Canizzo, J ;
Campana, S ;
Chester, MM ;
Chincarini, G ;
Cominsky, LR ;
Cucchiara, A ;
de Pasquale, M ;
Fenimore, EE ;
Gehrels, N ;
Giommi, P ;
Goad, M ;
Gronwall, C ;
Grupe, D ;
Hill, JE ;
Hinshaw, D ;
Hunsberger, S ;
Hurley, KC ;
Ivanushkina, M ;
Kennea, JA ;
Krimm, HA ;
Kumar, P ;
Landsman, W ;
La Parola, V ;
Markwardt, CB ;
McGowan, K ;
Mészáros, P ;
Mineo, T ;
Moretti, A ;
Morgan, A .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 637 (02) :901-913