The Evolution of Policy Instruments for Air Pollution Control in China: A Content Analysis of Policy Documents from 1973 to 2016

被引:20
作者
Zhao, Xinfeng [1 ]
Thomas, Craig W. [2 ]
Cai, Tianjian [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Normal Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Air-pollution control; China; Regulation; Policy instruments; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-020-01353-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China's portfolio of air-pollution control policy instruments has gradually broadened since the 1970s from regulatory instruments to include numerous market-based and voluntary policy instruments. We demonstrate this broadened portfolio of policy instruments for air-pollution control with a computer-assisted content analysis of 148 central-level policy documents from 1973 to 2016. We identify 20 types of policy instruments in these documents, and analyze such things as their historical evolution, main subjects, frequency of use, and whether they were issued by a single agency or jointly with other agencies. Prior research has found several factors complicating the diversification of policy instruments in China, including the late start of coordinated governance of air pollution, overreliance on regulatory instruments, insufficient use of market-based and voluntary instruments, the high cost of collecting shared information on a web-based platform, and the choice of policy instruments resulting from the "campaign-style" of governance. Given such challenges, we expected the policy documents to show little diversification of policy instruments and little coordination among agencies. The content analysis results show, however, a gradual shift from a centralized, regulatory model to an increasingly coordinated model using a diverse portfolio of policy instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 965
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ANAL QUALITATIVE DAT
[3]  
Chen J., 2016, Environ. Protect., V44, P10, DOI [DOI 10.14026/J.CNKI.0253-9705.2016.02.001., 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2016.02.001, DOI 10.14026/J.CNKI.0253-9705.2016.02.001]
[4]  
Chen W, 2017, COMP EC SOCIAL SYSTE, V3, P54
[5]  
Chen X.M., 2000, Qualitative research in social sciences
[6]   THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL COST [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1960, 3 (OCT) :1-44
[7]  
He XG., 2015, REFORM, V5, P33
[8]   From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: the new design orientation towards policy formulation research [J].
Howlett, Michael ;
Mukherjee, Ishani ;
Woo, Jun Jie .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 2015, 43 (02) :291-311
[9]   Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design [J].
Howlett, Michael ;
Rayner, Jeremy .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2013, 1 (02) :170-182
[10]  
Howlett Michael., 2005, DESIGNING GOVT, P31