Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: An overview of global monitoring tools

被引:154
作者
Guzman, P. C. [1 ]
Roders, A. R. Pereira [1 ]
Colenbrander, B. J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Built Environm, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Cultural heritage management; Sustainable urban development; Urban indicators; Cultural heritage indicators; INDICATORS; CITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.005
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The role of cultural heritage conservation has proven beneficial for the development of cities and communities. However, a lack of systematic assessment methodologies for adequate consideration of the gap between sustainable urban development and the conservation of cultural heritage, has been long noted by academia. This paper contributes to bridge this knowledge gap, by discussing the state of the practice from the urban perspective on the integration of cultural heritage as mean for sustainable development (SD). With a mixed-methodology, 19 reports on urban development, management and competitiveness were analyzed. The research identified three levels of inclusion: (1) at the strategic level; (2) at the operational level; (3) at the monitoring level. From the urban development perspective, two main approaches to heritage were identified: as cultural capital and as an urban phenomena requiring tailored urban management. Current links to the sustainability pillars and correlations of cultural heritage with wider urban factors are discussed. Conclusions highlight that a more thorough conceptualization and clearer correlation between cultural heritage management with wider urban phenomena is yet to be developed. Therefore, more efficient tools and more appropriate methodologies to correlate cultural heritage protection as an urban resource are still lacking. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 201
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [21] Methodological framework of sustainability assessment in City Sustainability Index (CSI): A concept of constraint and maximisation indicators
    Mori, Koichiro
    Yamashita, Tsuguta
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 45 : 10 - 14
  • [22] Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI)
    Mori, Koichiro
    Christodoulou, Aris
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2012, 32 (01) : 94 - 106
  • [23] Environmental feasibility of heritage buildings rehabilitation
    Munarim, Ulisses
    Ghisi, Enedir
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 58 : 235 - 249
  • [24] A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets
    Niemeijer, David
    de Groot, Rudolf S.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2008, 8 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [25] Assessing cultural heritage benefits for urban sustainable development
    Nijkamp, Peter
    Riganti, Patrizia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICES TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 10 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [26] Orbasli Aylin., 2000, Tourists in Historic Towns: Urban Conservation and Heritage Management
  • [27] Urban World Heritage Sites and the problem of authenticity
    Pendlebury, John
    Short, Michael
    While, Aidan
    [J]. CITIES, 2009, 26 (06) : 349 - 358
  • [28] Pereira Roders A, 2013, BDC B CTR CALZA BINI, V13, P79
  • [29] Pessoa J., 2009, The 2009 Unesco framework for cultural statistics (FCS)
  • [30] Portney K.E., 2002, LOCAL ENVIRON, V7, P363, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983022000027491, DOI 10.1080/1354983022000027491]