Evaluating a department's research: Testing the Leiden methodology in business and management

被引:10
作者
Mingers, John [1 ]
Lipitakis, Evangelia A. E. C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury CT7 2PE, Kent, England
关键词
Crown indicator; Research quality assessment; Citations; Leiden methodology; Business and management; CITATION; INDICATORS; RANKING; SCIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2012.11.002
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Leiden methodology (LM), also sometimes called the "crown indicator", is a quantitative method for evaluating the research quality of a research group or academic department based on the citations received by the group in comparison to averages for the field. There have been a number of applications but these have mainly been in the hard sciences where the data on citations, provided by the ISI Web of Science (WoS), is more reliable. In the social sciences, including business and management, many journals and books are not included within WoS and so the LM has not been tested here. In this research study the LM has been applied on a dataset of over 3000 research publications from three UK business schools. The results show that the LM does indeed discriminate between the schools, and has a degree of concordance with other forms of evaluation, but that there are significant limitations and problems within this discipline. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 595
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management
    Rafols, Ismael
    Leydesdorff, Loet
    O'Hare, Alice
    Nightingale, Paul
    Stirling, Andy
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (07) : 1262 - 1282
  • [42] Editor's Choice-The role of the emergency department in the management of acute heart failure: An international perspective on education and research
    Pang, Peter S.
    Collins, Sean P.
    Miro, Oscar
    Bueno, Hector
    Diercks, Deborah B.
    Di Somma, Salvatore
    Gray, Alasdair
    Harjola, Veli-Pekka
    Hollander, Judd E.
    Lambrinou, Ekaterini
    Levy, Phillip D.
    Papa, AnnMarie
    Moeckel, Martin
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2017, 6 (05) : 421 - 429
  • [43] Proposals for evaluating the regularity of a scientist's research output
    Franceschini, Fiorenzo
    Maisano, Domenico
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 88 (01) : 279 - 295
  • [44] Evaluating a state agency's case management services
    Garner, L
    Essock, S
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 1998, 13 (01) : 27 - 40
  • [45] Lean manufacturing and business performance: testing the S-curve theory
    Lopes Negrao, Leony Luis
    Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa
    Latan, Hengky
    Godinho Filho, Moacir
    Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose
    Devos Ganga, Gilberto Miller
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2020, 31 (10) : 771 - 785
  • [46] Business and management in China: A review of empirical research in leading international journals
    Quer D.
    Claver E.
    Rienda L.
    Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2007, 24 (3) : 359 - 384
  • [47] Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo
    Kraus, Sascha
    Durst, Susanne
    Ferreira, Joao J.
    Veiga, Pedro
    Kailer, Norbert
    Weinmann, Alexandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63
  • [48] Learning management systems: a review of the research methodology literature in Australia and China
    Turnbull, Darren
    Chugh, Ritesh
    Luck, Jo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION, 2021, 44 (02) : 164 - 178
  • [49] Research Misconduct in Business and Management Studies: Causes, Consequences, and Possible Remedies
    Tourish, Dennis
    Craig, Russell
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, 2020, 29 (02) : 174 - 187
  • [50] Knowledge Management And Data Mining: Emerging Business Intelligence Research Subspecialties
    Eom, Sean
    DSS 2.0 - SUPPORTING DECISION MAKING WITH NEW TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 261 : 353 - 362