Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system

被引:86
|
作者
Semenenko, Vladimir A. [1 ]
Reitz, Bodo [2 ]
Day, Ellen [2 ]
Qi, X. Sharon [1 ]
Miften, Moyed [3 ]
Li, X. Allen [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[3] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Radiat Oncol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
cancer; collimators; dosimetry; optimisation; radiation therapy; tumours;
D O I
10.1118/1.3013556
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A new inverse treatment planning system (TPS) for external beam radiation therapy with high energy photons is commercially available that utilizes both dose-volume-based cost functions and a selection of cost functions which are based on biological models. The purpose of this work is to evaluate quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans resulting from the use of biological cost functions in comparison to plans designed using a traditional TPS employing dose-volume-based optimization. Treatment planning was performed independently at two institutions. For six cancer patients, including head and neck (one case from each institution), prostate, brain, liver, and rectal cases, segmental multileaf collimator IMRT plans were designed using biological cost functions and compared with clinically used dose-based plans for the same patients. Dose-volume histograms and dosimetric indices, such as minimum, maximum, and mean dose, were extracted and compared between the two types of treatment plans. Comparisons of the generalized equivalent uniform dose (EUD), a previously proposed plan quality index (fEUD), target conformity and heterogeneity indices, and the number of segments and monitor units were also performed. The most prominent feature of the biologically based plans was better sparing of organs at risk (OARs). When all plans from both institutions were combined, the biologically based plans resulted in smaller EUD values for 26 out of 33 OARs by an average of 5.6 Gy (range 0.24 to 15 Gy). Owing to more efficient beam segmentation and leaf sequencing tools implemented in the biologically based TPS compared to the dose-based TPS, an estimated treatment delivery time was shorter in most (five out of six) cases with some plans showing up to 50% reduction. The biologically based plans were generally characterized by a smaller conformity index, but greater heterogeneity index compared to the dose-based plans. Overall, compared to plans based on dose-volume optimization, plans with equivalent target coverage obtained using the biologically based TPS demonstrate improved dose distributions for the majority of normal structures.
引用
收藏
页码:5851 / 5860
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic comparison of IMRT modules in commercial treatment planning systems
    de Langen, M
    Vieira, S
    Seppenwoolde, Y
    Geelen, B
    Storchi, P
    Heijmen, B
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S41 - S41
  • [22] A comparison of two commercial treatment-planning systems for IMRT
    Petric, M. Peter
    Clark, Brenda G.
    Robar, James L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 6 (03): : 63 - 80
  • [23] Evaluation of a commercial electron treatment planning system based on Monte Carlo techniques (eMC)
    Pemler, Peter
    Besserer, Juergen
    Schneider, Uwe
    Neuenschwander, Hans
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2006, 16 (04): : 313 - 329
  • [25] Monte Carlo verification of IMRT dose distributions from a commercial treatment planning optimization system
    Ma, CM
    Pawlicki, T
    Jiang, SB
    Li, JS
    Deng, J
    Mok, E
    Kapur, A
    Xing, L
    Ma, L
    Boyer, AL
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (09): : 2483 - 2495
  • [26] Efficient Outcomes-Driven IMRT Treatment Planning Using Commercial Treatment Planning Systems
    Li, X.
    Deasy, J.
    Mayo, C.
    Alber, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3334 - 3335
  • [27] Evaluation of a commercial automatic treatment planning system for prostate cancers
    Nawa, Kanabu
    Haga, Akihiro
    Nomoto, Akihiro
    Sarmiento, Raniel A.
    Shiraishi, Kenshiro
    Yamashita, Hideomi
    Nakagawa, Keiichi
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (03) : 203 - 209
  • [28] Dosimetric evaluation of a Monte Carlo IMRT treatment planning system incorporating the MIMiC
    Rassiah-Szegedi, P.
    Fuss, M.
    Sheikh-Bagheri, D.
    Szegedi, M.
    Stathakis, S.
    Lancaster, J.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Salter, B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (23): : 6931 - 6941
  • [29] Commissioning Compensator-Based IMRT in the Pinnacle Treatment Planning System
    Opp, D.
    Feygelman, V.
    Forster, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [30] Commissioning of modulator-based IMRT with XiO treatment planning system
    Oguchi, Hiroshi
    Obata, Yasunori
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (01) : 261 - 269