Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation

被引:48
作者
Yann Nguyen [1 ,2 ]
Mosnier, Isabelle [1 ,2 ]
Borel, Stephanie [2 ]
Ambert-Dahan, Emmanuelle [2 ]
Bouccara, Didier [1 ,2 ]
Bozorg-Grayeli, Alexis [1 ,2 ]
Ferrary, Evelyne [1 ,2 ]
Sterkers, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Diderot, Lab UMR S 867, Paris, France
[2] Hop Beaujon, AP HP, Serv Otorhinolaryngol & Chirurg Cervicofacial, Clichy, France
关键词
Soft surgery; cochleostomy; round window; RESIDUAL HEARING; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; INSERTION; SURGERY; CONSERVATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3109/00016489.2012.723824
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusion: Residual hearing could be preserved with various arrays ranging from 16 to 18 mm in insertion length and 0.25 to 0.5 mm tip diameter. Whether array insertion is performed through a cochleostomy or a round window, tip diameter is an essential criterion for the array design to improve hearing preservation results. Objectives: The goal of this study was to report the outcome of patients implanted with electric acoustic cochlear implants with various surgical techniques and array designs. Methods: Thirty-two implanted ears (30 patients) were included in this retrospective study. Three array models were inserted: Contour Advance implant (n = 16), Nucleus Hybrid-L (n = 12), and Med-El Flex EAS (n = 4). Postoperative pure tone audiometry was performed at 3 and 12 months after implantation. Results: Three months postoperatively, hearing preservation within 30 dB was achieved in 50%, 50%, and 84% cases of patients implanted with a Contour Advance, Flex-EAS, and Hybrid-L, respectively. Two patients (Hybrid-L group) had a delayed sudden hearing loss (> 30 dB) 3 months postoperatively and three patients (Contour Advance group) had total hearing loss at 1 year. Best results were achieved using arrays with small tip diameters. Cochleostomy or round window insertion did not affect hearing preservation results.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 122
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping [J].
Baskent, D ;
Shannon, RV .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 117 (03) :1405-1416
[2]   Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques [J].
Berrettini, S. ;
Forli, F. ;
Passetti, S. .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2008, 122 (03) :246-252
[3]   A surgical robot for cochleostomy [J].
Brett, P. N. ;
Taylor, R. P. ;
Proops, D. ;
Coulson, C. ;
Reid, A. ;
Griffiths, M. V. .
2007 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-16, 2007, :1229-+
[4]  
Briggs Robert J S, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P42, DOI 10.1159/000095613
[5]   Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients [J].
Di Nardo, Walter ;
Cantore, Italo ;
Melillo, Pietro ;
Cianfrone, Francesca ;
Scorpecci, Alessandro ;
Paludetti, Gaetano .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 264 (08) :855-860
[6]  
Escude Bernard, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P27, DOI 10.1159/000095611
[7]   Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant [J].
Fraysse, Bernard ;
Macias, Angel Ramos ;
Sterkers, Olivier ;
Burdo, Sandro ;
Ramsden, Richard ;
Deguine, Olivier ;
Klenzner, Thomas ;
Lenarz, Thomas ;
Rodriguez, Manuel Manrique ;
Von Wallenberg, Ernst ;
James, Chris .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) :624-633
[8]   Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing [J].
Gantz, BJ ;
Turner, C ;
Gfeller, KE ;
Lowder, MW .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (05) :796-802
[9]   A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results [J].
Gstoettner, Wolfgang ;
Helbig, Silke ;
Settevendemie, Claudia ;
Baumann, Uwe ;
Wagenblast, Jens ;
Arnoldner, Christoph .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2009, 129 (04) :372-379
[10]  
Gstoettner Wolfgang K, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P49, DOI 10.1159/000095614