Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation

被引:47
作者
Yann Nguyen [1 ,2 ]
Mosnier, Isabelle [1 ,2 ]
Borel, Stephanie [2 ]
Ambert-Dahan, Emmanuelle [2 ]
Bouccara, Didier [1 ,2 ]
Bozorg-Grayeli, Alexis [1 ,2 ]
Ferrary, Evelyne [1 ,2 ]
Sterkers, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Diderot, Lab UMR S 867, Paris, France
[2] Hop Beaujon, AP HP, Serv Otorhinolaryngol & Chirurg Cervicofacial, Clichy, France
关键词
Soft surgery; cochleostomy; round window; RESIDUAL HEARING; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; INSERTION; SURGERY; CONSERVATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3109/00016489.2012.723824
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusion: Residual hearing could be preserved with various arrays ranging from 16 to 18 mm in insertion length and 0.25 to 0.5 mm tip diameter. Whether array insertion is performed through a cochleostomy or a round window, tip diameter is an essential criterion for the array design to improve hearing preservation results. Objectives: The goal of this study was to report the outcome of patients implanted with electric acoustic cochlear implants with various surgical techniques and array designs. Methods: Thirty-two implanted ears (30 patients) were included in this retrospective study. Three array models were inserted: Contour Advance implant (n = 16), Nucleus Hybrid-L (n = 12), and Med-El Flex EAS (n = 4). Postoperative pure tone audiometry was performed at 3 and 12 months after implantation. Results: Three months postoperatively, hearing preservation within 30 dB was achieved in 50%, 50%, and 84% cases of patients implanted with a Contour Advance, Flex-EAS, and Hybrid-L, respectively. Two patients (Hybrid-L group) had a delayed sudden hearing loss (> 30 dB) 3 months postoperatively and three patients (Contour Advance group) had total hearing loss at 1 year. Best results were achieved using arrays with small tip diameters. Cochleostomy or round window insertion did not affect hearing preservation results.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 122
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping
    Baskent, D
    Shannon, RV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 117 (03) : 1405 - 1416
  • [2] Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques
    Berrettini, S.
    Forli, F.
    Passetti, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2008, 122 (03) : 246 - 252
  • [3] A surgical robot for cochleostomy
    Brett, P. N.
    Taylor, R. P.
    Proops, D.
    Coulson, C.
    Reid, A.
    Griffiths, M. V.
    [J]. 2007 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-16, 2007, : 1229 - +
  • [4] Briggs Robert J S, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P42, DOI 10.1159/000095613
  • [5] Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients
    Di Nardo, Walter
    Cantore, Italo
    Melillo, Pietro
    Cianfrone, Francesca
    Scorpecci, Alessandro
    Paludetti, Gaetano
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 264 (08) : 855 - 860
  • [6] Escude Bernard, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P27, DOI 10.1159/000095611
  • [7] Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant
    Fraysse, Bernard
    Macias, Angel Ramos
    Sterkers, Olivier
    Burdo, Sandro
    Ramsden, Richard
    Deguine, Olivier
    Klenzner, Thomas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Rodriguez, Manuel Manrique
    Von Wallenberg, Ernst
    James, Chris
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) : 624 - 633
  • [8] Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing
    Gantz, BJ
    Turner, C
    Gfeller, KE
    Lowder, MW
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (05) : 796 - 802
  • [9] A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results
    Gstoettner, Wolfgang
    Helbig, Silke
    Settevendemie, Claudia
    Baumann, Uwe
    Wagenblast, Jens
    Arnoldner, Christoph
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2009, 129 (04) : 372 - 379
  • [10] Gstoettner Wolfgang K, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P49, DOI 10.1159/000095614