Prefrontal Cortical Mechanisms Underlying Individual Differences in Cognitive Flexibility and Stability

被引:130
作者
Armbruster, Diana J. N. [1 ,2 ]
Ueltzhoeffer, Kai [2 ]
Basten, Ulrike
Fiebach, Christian J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Psychol, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] IDeA Ctr Individual Dev & Adapt Educ, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
INFERIOR FRONTAL JUNCTION; SPONTANEOUS EYEBLINK RATE; EVENT-RELATED FMRI; WORKING-MEMORY; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; PERSISTENT ACTIVITY; DEFAULT MODE; DOPAMINE; CORTEX; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_00286
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The pFC is critical for cognitive flexibility (i.e., our ability to flexibly adjust behavior to changing environmental demands), but also for cognitive stability (i.e., our ability to follow behavioral plans in the face of distraction). Behavioral research suggests that individuals differ in their cognitive flexibility and stability, and neurocomputational theories of working memory relate this variability to the concept of attractor stability in recurrently connected neural networks. We introduce a novel task paradigm to simultaneously assess flexible switching between task rules (cognitive flexibility) and task performance in the presence of irrelevant distractors (cognitive stability) and to furthermore assess the individual "spontaneous switching rate" in response to ambiguous stimuli to quantify the individual dispositional cognitive flexibility in a theoretically motivated way (i.e., as a proxy for attractor stability). Using fMRI in healthy human participants, a common network consisting of parietal and frontal areas was found for task switching and distractor inhibition. More flexible persons showed reduced activation and reduced functional coupling in frontal areas, including the inferior frontal junction, during task switching. Most importantly, the individual spontaneous switching rate antagonistically affected the functional coupling between inferior frontal junction and the superior frontal gyrus during task switching and distractor inhibition, respectively, indicating that individual differences in cognitive flexibility and stability are indeed related to a common prefrontal neural mechanism. We suggest that the concept of attractor stability of prefrontal working memory networks is a meaningful model for individual differences in cognitive stability versus flexibility.
引用
收藏
页码:2385 / 2399
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1927, ARCH PSYCHOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], NONLINEAR DYNAMICS C
[3]   Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex [J].
Aron, AR ;
Robbins, TW ;
Poldrack, RA .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (04) :170-177
[4]   A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex [J].
Aron, AR ;
Monsell, S ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
BRAIN, 2004, 127 :1561-1573
[5]   Executive Function: The Search for an Integrated Account [J].
Banich, Marie T. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (02) :89-94
[6]   Cognitive control involved in overcoming prepotent response tendencies and switching between tasks [J].
Barber, AD ;
Carter, CS .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2005, 15 (07) :899-912
[7]   The catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism:: Relations to the tonic-phasic dopamine hypothesis and neuropsychiatric phenotypes [J].
Bilder, RM ;
Volavka, J ;
Lachman, HM ;
Grace, AA .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 29 (11) :1943-1961
[8]   The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control [J].
Brass, M ;
Derrfuss, J ;
Forstmann, B ;
von Cramon, DY .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (07) :314-316
[9]   Effects of neuromodulation in a cortical network model of object working memory dominated by recurrent inhibition [J].
Brunel, N ;
Wang, XJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 11 (01) :63-85
[10]   The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function [J].
Burgess, Paul W. ;
Dumontheil, Iroise ;
Gilbert, Sam J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (07) :290-298