A comparison of classification methods as diagnostic system: A case study on skin lesions

被引:16
作者
Odeh, Suhail M. [1 ]
Baareh, Abdel Karim Mohamed [2 ]
机构
[1] Bethlehem Univ, Comp & Informat Syst Dept, Bethlehem, Palestine
[2] Al Balqa Appl Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Ajloun Coll, As Salt, Jordan
关键词
K nearest neighbour; Genetic algorithm; Artificial Neural Networks; Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference; System (ANFIS); Skin cancer; Diagnosis system; EFFICIENT OPTIMUM SOLUTION; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.09.012
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Numerous classification methods are currently available, but most of them were performed on different datasets. In this paper, different classification techniques were used for a diagnostic system on different skin lesions for the same data, which gives consistency for the data to have more accurate and better results. Methods: Four classification methods were proposed, a classical method based on K-Nearest Neighbor with Sequential Scanning selection technique for feature selection, a classical method with complex technique KNN with Genetic Algorithm, a complex method based on Artificial Neural Networks with Genetic Algorithm and an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. Results: From the results obtained we can say that the performance of KNN with optimization of genetic algorithm for the feature selection was the best with an accuracy rate of 94%. The Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System result was also good with an accuracy rate of 92%, and the other techniques' results were also satisfactory. Conclusion: The improvement on the performance of the classifier depends on the feature selection methods. In addition, the diagnosis system as a decision support tool could be used to increase the performance of human experts to make a correct decision. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 319
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT REV COMPUT SOFTW
[2]  
Baareh AK., 2013, J SOFTW ENG APPL, V6, P338, DOI [10.4236/jsea.2013.67042, DOI 10.4236/JSEA.2013.67042]
[3]  
Baker J. E., 1987, Genetic Algorithms and their Applications: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, P14
[4]  
BOTTOU L, 1994, INT C PATT RECOG, P77, DOI 10.1109/ICPR.1994.576879
[5]  
Cawley G., 2015, TRAINING MLP NEURAL
[6]   Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective and multimodal optimization of diagnostic schemes [J].
de Toro, F ;
Ros, E ;
Mota, S ;
Ortega, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 53 (02) :178-189
[7]   COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS OF THE PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A FUZZY-EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH [J].
de Toro, Francisco ;
Aroba, Javier ;
Ros, Eduardo .
APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 25 (07) :590-608
[8]  
Dreiseitl S, 2001, J BIOMED INFORM, V34, P28, DOI 10.1006/jbin.2001.10004
[9]  
Goldberg DE., 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHMS S, V1
[10]  
Heazlewood I., 2015, P 10 INT S COMP SCI