ADOPTION OF SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION PRACTICES AND ITS EFFECT ON SMALLHOLDERS' FOOD SECURITY IN ETHIOPIA

被引:5
作者
Aseres, M. E. [1 ]
Liu, A. [2 ]
Mwalupaso, G. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Agr Univ, China Ctr Food Secur Studies, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH | 2019年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
land degradation; packages; environmental protection; SWC; impact; WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES; AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; BIOLOGICAL SOIL; WEST-BENGAL; TECHNOLOGY; INSECURITY; IDENTIFICATION; PRODUCTIVITY; AGROFORESTRY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.15666/aeer/1703_66816700
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Sustainable intensification practice (SIP) facilitates increased and sustained productivity of the limited and existing farmland with less pressure on the environment. Currently, there is a myriad of literature on the effect of SIP on food security. However, unlike previous studies, this study examines the effect of the adoption of multiple sustainable intensification practices on the improvement of food security among smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Three basic conservation techniques, Agronomic (A), Biological (B) and Physical (P), are analyzed after derivation from 13 implemented soil and water conservation (SWC) practices using principal component analysis (PCA). The result of the multinomial endogenous switching regression (MNESR) shows that SIP adopters have a 55% higher food security, have 51% more access to clean water and sanitation, and consume at least one more dietary food item daily than non SIP adopters. A complete (A(1)B(1)P(1)) and combined (A(0)B(1)P(1) and A(1)B(1)P(0)) package had the highest food security status as compared to other combination strategies, while single technology users gain the least benefit. Our findings strongly promote the adoption of a complete or combined SIP package in agriculture to leverage the full benefits associated with food security.
引用
收藏
页码:6681 / 6700
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The Adoption and Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Technology: An Endogenous Switching Regression Application [J].
Abdulai, Awudu ;
Huffman, Wallace .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2014, 90 (01) :26-43
[2]  
ABDULRAHIM AS, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, V10
[3]   Impacts of long-term soil and water conservation on agricultural productivity: The case of Anjenie watershed, Ethiopia [J].
Adgo, Enyew ;
Teshome, Akalu ;
Mati, Bancy .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 117 :55-61
[4]  
Amare Tadele, 2014, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V14, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2014.07.002
[5]  
Anderson S., 2015, USAID Office of Food for Peace Food Security Country Framework for Ethiopia FY 2016-FY 2020
[6]  
Anim FDK, 1999, J AGR ECON, V50, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00818.x
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, UNPUBLISHED MASTER T
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CLIM CHANG AGR FOOD
[9]   Factors affecting adoption of soil and water conservation practices: The case of Wereillu Woreda (District), South Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia [J].
Asfaw, Daniel ;
Neka, Mulugeta .
INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2017, 5 (04) :273-279
[10]  
Bangali-Solomon F., 2015, STATE KNOWLEDGE CSA