Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Abscesses

被引:13
作者
Truong Luong Francis Nguyen [1 ]
Soyer, Philippe [2 ]
Barbe, Coralie [3 ]
Graesslin, Olivier [4 ]
Veron, Sophie [1 ]
Amzallag-Bellenger, Elisa [1 ]
Tomas, Catherine [1 ]
Hoeffel, Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Robert Debre, Dept Radiol, F-51092 Reims, France
[2] Hop Lariboisiere, Dept Radiol, F-75475 Paris, France
[3] Hop Robert Debre, Dept Stat, F-51092 Reims, France
[4] Hop Robert Debre, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, F-51092 Reims, France
关键词
pelvic abscesses; infection; MRI; diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; diagnosis; BRAIN-ABSCESS; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; MR; TUMORS; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828bea16
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to prospectively assess the added value of gadolinium-enhanced and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to pelvic T2-weighted MRI for diagnosis of deep pelvic abscesses. Methods: Twenty-nine patients with suspected abscess and a control group of 43 patients underwent T2-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted and DWI magnetic resonance sequences. Three readers (R1, R2, R3) scored likelihood of abscess on standard MRI, standard MRI + gadolinium, and standard MRI + DWI. Results: Twenty-nine patients had 36 abscesses. On standard MRI, R1 achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.97, sensitivity 92%, and specificity 100%. For R2, these figures were 0.87, 81%, and 100%, and for R3, these were 0.85, 83%, and 79%. After gadolinium, R2 improved AUC to 0.97 (P = 0.005), and R3 to 0.95 (P = 0.006). Standard MRI + DWI yielded improved AUC for all readers (P = 0.15, 0.001, and 0.001 for R1, R2, R3, respectively). Conclusions: Addition of gadolinium or DWI to T2-weighted MRI improves performances for the diagnosis of deep pelvic abscess. Diffusion-weighted imaging may replace gadolinium.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 979
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Role of diffusion-weighted MR in differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic lesions [J].
Bükte, Y ;
Paksoy, Y ;
Genç, E ;
Uca, AU .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 60 (03) :375-383
[2]   Differentiation between pelvic abscesses and pelvic tumors with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: a preliminary study [J].
Chou, Chen-Pin ;
Chiou, Shih-Hwa ;
Levenson, Robin B. ;
Huang, Jer-Shyung ;
Yang, Tsung-Lung ;
Yu, Chia-Cheng ;
Chiang, An-Jen ;
Pan, Huay-Ben .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2012, 36 (05) :532-538
[3]   Rectal Cancer: Assessment of Complete Response to Preoperative Combined Radiation Therapy with Chemotherapy-Conventional MR Volumetry versus Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging [J].
Curvo-Semedo, Lus ;
Lambregts, Doenja M. J. ;
Maas, Monique ;
Thywissen, Thomas ;
Mehsen, Rana T. ;
Lammering, Guido ;
Beets, Geerard L. ;
Caseiro-Alves, Filipe ;
Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (03) :734-743
[4]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[5]  
Desprechins B, 1999, AM J NEURORADIOL, V20, P1252
[6]   Discrimination of brain abscess from necrotic or cystic tumors by diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging [J].
Ebisu, T ;
Tanaka, C ;
Umeda, M ;
Kitamura, M ;
Naruse, S ;
Higuchi, T ;
Ueda, S ;
Sato, H .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 14 (09) :1113-1116
[7]  
Fleiss JL., 1981, STATISTICAL METHODS, P211, DOI DOI 10.2307/2530193
[8]   MR imaging of skeletal soft tissue infection: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting abscess formation [J].
Harish, Srinivasan ;
Chiavaras, Mary M. ;
Kotnis, Nikhil ;
Rebello, Ryan .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (03) :285-294
[9]   MR Imaging for Acute Lower Abdominal and Pelvic Pain [J].
Heverhagen, Johannes T. ;
Klose, Klaus J. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2009, 29 (06) :1781-U296
[10]   Diffusion-Weighted MRI: A New Tool for the Diagnosis of Fistula in Ano [J].
Hori, Masatoshi ;
Oto, Aytekin ;
Orrin, Sarah ;
Suzuki, Kenji ;
Baron, Richard L. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (05) :1021-1026