Assessment of LID-BMPs for Urban Runoff Control in Newly Developing Zones: the Case of Yanming Lake Residential District, China

被引:0
作者
Liu, Min [1 ]
Zhou, Chuanbin [1 ]
Wang, Rusong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ecoenvironm Sci Res Ctr, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
DISASTER ADVANCES | 2013年 / 6卷 / 09期
关键词
Stormwater runoff; low impact development (LID); stormwater best management practices (BMPs); assessment; SCS-CN; CURVE NUMBER; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; SYSTEM; SITES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The best management practices for low impact development (LID-BMPs) have been widely applied to control stormwater runoff. LID-BMPs using bio-retention and bio-filtration swales were planned to control the urban runoff in the studied case of the Yanming Lake Residential District which is a developing urban zone. The control of runoff by the LID-BMPs was simulated and assessed by applying the following methods of scenario analysis, SCS-CN model and GIS tool. The three scenarios studied were the existing background (EB), a conventional stormwater drainage system (CSD) and an ecologically designed stormwater system (EDS). We found that the land use types affected rainfall-runoff, with the runoff depth decreasing in the following land use types: road > commercial land > residential land > arable land > woodland > green/grassland. The different stormwater controlling systems, in the same land use type, also affected the runoff amount, with the runoff from EDS being 77.2% to 87.7% less than CSD. EDS had a "system-wide" reduction of runoff volume. The runoff volume of EDS (3.50 x 10(6) m(3)) was 25% less than EB (4.69 x 10(6) m(3)) and 36% less than CSD (5.49 x 10(6) m(3)). EDS showed the best performance on flood control, the submerged area was reduced by (1.84 x 10(6) m(2)) (24.0%) and (2.09 x 10(6) m(2)) (25.5%) compared to EB and CSD respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 10
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Bo Yang, 2010, TEXAS ECOLOGICAL ENG, V36, P639
[2]   Effect of spatial variability of storm on the optimal placement of best management practices (BMPs) [J].
Chang, C. L. ;
Chiueh, P. T. ;
Lo, S. L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2007, 135 (1-3) :383-389
[3]   BMP decision support system for evaluating stormwater management alternatives [J].
Cheng, Mow-Soung ;
Zhen, Jenny X. ;
Shoemaker, Leslie .
FRONTIERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING IN CHINA, 2009, 3 (04) :453-463
[4]   The storage potential of different surface coverings for various scale storms on Wu-Tu watershed, Taiwan [J].
Cheng, Shin-Jen ;
Hsieh, Huey-Hong ;
Lee, Cheng-Feng ;
Wang, Yu-Ming .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2008, 44 (01) :129-146
[5]  
CWP (Center for Watershed Protection), APP C UPD BMP REM EF
[6]   Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions [J].
Dietz, Michael E. .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2007, 186 (1-4) :351-363
[7]   The effects of buffer strips and bioretention facilities on agricultural productivity and environmental quality in Central Africa [J].
Gilroy, Kristin L. ;
McCuen, Richard H. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 385 (1-4) :1-12
[8]   Spatio-temporal effects of low impact development practices [J].
Gilroy, Kristin L. ;
McCuen, Richard H. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2009, 367 (3-4) :228-236
[9]   Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina [J].
Hunt, W. F. ;
Jarrett, A. R. ;
Smith, J. T. ;
Sharkey, L. J. .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (06) :600-608
[10]   Evaluation of AMC-dependent SCS-CN-based models using watershed characteristics [J].
Jain, M. K. ;
Mishra, S. K. ;
Singh, V. P. .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2006, 20 (04) :531-552