Fast, simple, and good pan-sharpening method

被引:27
作者
Palubinskas, Gintautas [1 ]
机构
[1] DLR, German Aerosp Ctr, Remote Sensing Technol Inst, D-82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Wessling, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING | 2013年 / 7卷
关键词
image fusion; multiresolution; multisensor; quality assessment; SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES; FUSION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1117/1.JRS.7.073526
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Pan-sharpening of optical remote sensing multispectral imagery aims to include spatial information from a high-resolution image (high frequencies) into a low-resolution image (low frequencies) while preserving spectral properties of a low-resolution image. From a signal processing view, a general fusion filtering framework (GFF) can be formulated, which is very well suitable for a fusion of multiresolution and multisensor data such as optical-optical and optical-radar imagery. To reduce computation time, a simple and fast variant of GFF-high-pass filtering method (HPFM)-is proposed, which performs filtering in signal domain and thus avoids time-consuming FFT computations. A new joint quality measure based on the combination of two spectral and spatial measures was proposed for quality assessment by a proper normalization of the ranges of variables. Quality and speed of six pan-sharpening methods-component substitution (CS), Gram-Schmidt (GS) sharpening, Ehlers fusion, Amelioration de la Resolution Spatiale par Injection de Structures, GFF, and HPFM-were evaluated for WorldView-2 satellite remote sensing data. Experiments showed that the HPFM method out-performs all the fusion methods used in this study, even its parentage method GFF. Moreover, it is more than four times faster than GFF method and competitive with CS and GS methods in speed. (c) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF PAN-SHARPENING METHODS [J].
Palubinskas, Gintautas .
2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2014, :2526-2529
[2]   A Comparative Study on Pan-Sharpening Algorithms [J].
Abu Alhin, Khaldoun ;
Niemeyer, Irmgard .
IMAGIN [E,G] EUROPE, 2010, :1-9
[3]   A Variational Approach for Pan-Sharpening [J].
Fang, Faming ;
Li, Fang ;
Shen, Chaomin ;
Zhang, Guixu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2013, 22 (07) :2822-2834
[4]   Framelet based pan-sharpening via a variational method [J].
Fang, Faming ;
Zhang, Guixu ;
Li, Fang ;
Shen, Chaomin .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2014, 129 :362-377
[5]   A New Pan-Sharpening Method Using Statistical Model and Shearlet Transform [J].
Zhang, Zhancheng ;
Luo, Xiaoqing ;
Wu, Xiaojun .
IETE TECHNICAL REVIEW, 2014, 31 (05) :308-316
[6]   Analysis and selection of pan-sharpening assessment measures [J].
Makarau, Aliaksei ;
Palubinskas, Gintautas ;
Reinartz, Peter .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 6
[7]   Nonlinear IHS: A Promising Method for Pan-Sharpening [J].
Ghahremani, Morteza ;
Ghassemian, Hassan .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2016, 13 (11) :1606-1610
[8]   A New Pan-Sharpening Method Using a Compressed Sensing Technique [J].
Li, Shutao ;
Yang, Bin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 49 (02) :738-746
[9]   Adaptive steepest descent method for pan-sharpening of multispectral images [J].
Liu, Lining ;
Wang, Yunhong ;
Wang, Yiding .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 50 (09)
[10]   A Fast Variational Fusion Approach for Pan-Sharpening [J].
Zhou, Ze-ming ;
Li, Yuan-xiang ;
Shi, Han-qing ;
Ma, Ning ;
He, Chun ;
Zhang, Peng .
2010 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING PROCEEDINGS (ICSP2010), VOLS I-III, 2010, :1110-+