Unravelling the Extraterritorial Riddle An Analysis of R (Hassan) v. Secretary of State for Defence

被引:3
作者
King, Hugh [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Law, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
HUMAN-RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1093/jicj/mqp037
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The European Convention on Human Rights imposes an obligation on contracting states to secure the rights of persons within their 'jurisdiction'. Yet, the meaning of 'jurisdiction' is contested, with the result that the extent of states' extraterritorial obligations is unclear. R (Hassan) v. Secretary of State for Defence is the latest in a series of English cases to examine the obligations of the British forces in Iraq. This comment critically assesses the High Court's reasoning, as well as the House of Lords' decision in Al-Skeini on which it relies, and in so doing proposes a more nuanced understanding of 'jurisdiction'.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 643
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ICJ Reports, P3
[2]  
DESCHUTTER O, 2006, BALTIC YB INT LAW, V6, P196
[3]  
Higgins R, 1994, PROBLEMS PROC INT LA, P146
[4]  
LAWSON R, 2004, EXTRATERRITORIAL APP, P113
[5]  
Lowe Vaughan., 2006, INT LAW, V2nd, P335
[6]   Extending Judicial Control in International Law: Human Rights Treaties and Extraterritoriality [J].
Mantouvalou, Virginia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005, 9 (02) :147-163
[7]   From Compromise to Principle: Clarifying the Concept of State Jurisdiction in Human Rights Treaties [J].
Milanovic, Marko .
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW, 2008, 8 (03) :411-448
[8]  
Orakhelashvili A., 2003, European Journal of International Law, V14, P529, DOI DOI 10.1093/EJIL/14.3.529
[9]   Bankovic et al v. Belgium (admissibility) -: European Court of Human Rights decision on applicability of the European Convention on Human Rights to NATO bombing in Serbia [J].
Rüth, A ;
Trilsch, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2003, 97 (01) :168-172
[10]  
Thienel T., 2008, Journal of International Criminal Justice, V6, P115, DOI DOI 10.1093/JICJ/MQM077