Comparison of the immunogenicity of Dukoral® oral cholera vaccine between renal transplant recipients on either a calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate - A controlled trial

被引:8
作者
Jonker, Emile F. F. [1 ]
Uijlings, Marjolein A. C. [1 ]
Visser, Leonardus G. [1 ]
Soonawala, Darius [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Infect Dis, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, C7,POB 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Haga Teaching Hosp, Dept Internal Med, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Oral cholera vaccine; Renal transplant recipient; Calcineurin inhibitor; Mycophenolate; Cholera toxin; Vibriocidal antibody response; IgA; Anti-toxin antibody; ENTEROTOXIGENIC ESCHERICHIA-COLI; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY; PROTECTION; SAFETY; IMMUNIZATION; INFECTION; EFFICACY; LIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.010
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The evidence for recommendations regarding vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients is sparse. There is little data comparing vaccine responses between groups on different immunosuppressive drugs. This study was conducted to evaluate the antibody response to Dukoral (R) oral cholera vaccine in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Methods: In a single-center non-randomized controlled clinical trial, healthy volunteers (n = 21) and renal transplant recipients (n = 30) were vaccinated with the oral whole cell/recombinant B subunit cholera vaccine Dukoral (R) (Valneva Inc., Vienna, Austria). The RTR were stratified according to their maintenance immunosuppressive therapy: either prednisone and a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus; P/CNI group; n = 15) or prednisone and mycophenolate (P/MMF group; n = 15). All volunteers ingested Dukoral (R) at baseline and at day 14. Serum samples were drawn at day 0 and day 21. The primary outcome was seroconversion, defined as either a 3-fold IgA serum titer increase in anti-cholera toxin B antibodies and/or a 4-fold rise in the serum vibriocidal titer. Results: Follow-up was complete. Seroconversion after vaccination was 57% (standard error, SE 9%) in RTR and 81% (SE 9%) in healthy controls (Relative Risk, RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.48-1.02). When stratified according to maintenance immunosuppression, the seroconversion rate was 67% (SE 12%) in the P/CNI group (RR compared with controls 0.82; 95% CI 0.55-1.25) and 47% (SE 13%) in the P/MMF group (RR compared with controls 0.58; 95% CI 0.32-1.03). Conclusion: Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient. The response to Dukoral was weaker and the seroconversion rate was lower in renal transplant recipients than in healthy controls. In particular, those using mycophenolate had a poor response. Nevertheless, more than half of the transplant recipients seroconverted. Therefore oral vaccines should not be discarded as a potential tool for protection of solid organ transplant recipients. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3133 / 3139
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Agency EM, 2004, EU103263001003 AG EM
  • [2] Agency EM, 2009, EMA6436442014
  • [3] Vaccines for preventing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) diarrhoea
    Ahmed, Tanvir
    Bhuiyan, Taufiqur R.
    Zaman, K.
    Sinclair, David
    Qadri, Firdausi
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (07):
  • [4] Seroconversion of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccination in kidney transplant patients and the influence of different risk factors
    Azevedo, L. S.
    Gerhard, J.
    Miraglia, J. L.
    Precioso, A. R.
    Tavares Timenetsky, M. dC S.
    Agena, F.
    Gamba, C.
    Shikanai Yasuda, M. A.
    David-Neto, E.
    Pierrotti, L.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2013, 15 (06) : 612 - 618
  • [5] Bi QF, 2017, LANCET INFECT DIS, V17, P1080, DOI [10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30359-6, 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30359-6]
  • [6] Vibrio cholerae: lessons for mucosal vaccine design
    Bishop, Anne L.
    Camilli, Andrew
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2011, 10 (01) : 79 - 94
  • [7] Safety and Immunogenicity of Escalating Dosages of a Single Oral Administration of Peru-15 pCTB, a Candidate Live, Attenuated Vaccine against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae
    Chen, Wilbur H.
    Garza, Jose
    Choquette, Monique
    Hawkins, Jennifer
    Hoeper, Amy
    Bernstein, David I.
    Cohen, Mitchell B.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 22 (01) : 129 - 135
  • [8] Safety of live vaccinations on immunosuppressive therapy in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, solid organ transplantation or after bone-marrow transplantation - A systematic review of randomized trials, observational studies and case reports
    Croce, Evelina
    Hatz, Christoph
    Jonker, Emile F.
    Visser, L. G.
    Jaeger, Veronika K.
    Buhler, Silja
    [J]. VACCINE, 2017, 35 (09) : 1216 - 1226
  • [9] KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Eckardt, Kai-Uwe
    Kasiske, Bertram L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : S1 - S155
  • [10] Serologic Vaccination Response after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review
    Eckerle, Isabella
    Rosenberger, Kerstin Daniela
    Zwahlen, Marcel
    Junghanss, Thomas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):