Procedure for certification of QST laboratories

被引:36
|
作者
Geber, C. [2 ]
Scherens, A. [1 ]
Pfau, D. [3 ]
Nestler, N. [4 ]
Zenz, M.
Toelle, T. [5 ]
Baron, R. [6 ]
Treede, R. -D. [3 ]
Maier, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Berufsgenossenschaftl Univ Klin Bergmannsheil Gmb, Abt Schmerztherapie, Klin Anasthesiol Intensiv Pallat & Schmerzmed, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Neurol Klin & Poliklin, Mainz, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, CBTM, Lehrstuhl Neurophysiol, Med Fak Mannheim, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany
[4] Certkom eV, Bochum, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Neurol Klin, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[6] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Neurol Klin, Kiel, Germany
来源
SCHMERZ | 2009年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Quantitative sensory testing (QST); Certification; Neuropathic pain; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; SENSORY LOSS; MECHANISMS; THRESHOLDS; SYMPTOMS; PROTOCOL; SIGNS;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-008-0771-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is the standardized assessment of the somatosensory system comprising all sensory submodalities. In the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS), a QST-battery consisting of 13 parameters has been established and nationwide normative data have been collected. In contrast to conventional electrophysiology, QST allows detecting negative and positive sensory signs of both large and small fiber systems. However, as a subjective psychophysical method it is critically dependent on patients'/healthy subjects' cooperation. Thus strictly standardized protocols and instructions are needed to allow across laboratory comparisons. To facilitate more widespread use of QST, the German Pain Society (DGSS) and the DFNS have initiated a certification procedure for QST quality standards. Therefore, structural, procedural criteria and outcome parameters were establishd and are hereby presented. By maintaining high quality standards, the certification of QST is intended to contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms behind neuropathic pain syndromes and thereby improve patient care as well as sensory assessment in clinical studies on the treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 69
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Zertifizierungsrichtlinien für QST-LaboreProcedure for certification of QST laboratories
    C. Geber
    A. Scherens
    D. Pfau
    N. Nestler
    M. Zenz
    T. Tölle
    R. Baron
    R.-D. Treede
    C. Maier
    Der Schmerz, 2009, 23
  • [2] Accreditation and/or certification for laboratories?
    Christelsohn, M
    Meyer, JC
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 1997, 2 (02) : 82 - 85
  • [3] Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST)
    Pigg, Maria
    Baad-Hansen, Lene
    Svensson, Peter
    Drangsholt, Mark
    List, Thomas
    PAIN, 2010, 148 (02) : 220 - 226
  • [4] Quantitative sensory testing (QST) in the orofacial region of healthy Chinese: influence of site, gender and age
    Wang, Yanting
    Mo, Xueyin
    Zhang, Jinglu
    Fan, Yuan
    Wang, Kelun
    Peter, Svensson
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 76 (01) : 58 - 63
  • [5] Certification procedure of building thermographers
    Kauppinen, T
    Paloniitty, S
    Krankka, J
    THERMOSENSE XXVII, 2005, 5782 : 188 - 194
  • [6] Certification of myasthenia centres: developing and implementing a certification procedure for patient organisations
    Bungard, Sven
    Rohn, Hans
    Doebler, Klaus
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2011, 105 (01): : 49 - 53
  • [7] Quality management, certification and accreditation in medical laboratories – the view of ECLM
    R. Dybkaer
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 1999, 4 : 90 - 92
  • [8] CERTIFICATION OF PERSONS: AN IMPORTANT CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
    Kavosa, Maija
    Lapina, Inga
    SMART AND EFFICIENT ECONOMY: PREPARATION FOR THE FUTURE INNOVATIVE ECONOMY, 2016, : 294 - 300
  • [9] A pilot experiment of joint assessments by accreditation and certification bodies in clinical laboratories
    Siloaho, M
    Anttalainen, E
    Kociba, P
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2001, 6 (06) : 272 - 273
  • [10] A pilot experiment of joint assessments by accreditation and certification bodies in clinical laboratories
    M. Siloaho
    Eija Anttalainen
    Pirkko Kociba
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2001, 6 : 272 - 273