Cross-sectional validation of the PROMIS-Preference scoring system by its association with social determinants of health

被引:17
作者
Hanmer, Janel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Health-related quality of life; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS); PROMIS-Preference (PROPr); Social determinants of health; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-020-02691-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) is a generic, societal, preference-based summary score that uses seven domains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). This report evaluates construct validity of PROPr by its association with social determinants of health (SDoH). Methods An online panel survey of the US adult population included PROPr, SDoH, demographics, chronic conditions, and four other scores: the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark 2 and Mark 3, and the Short Form-6D (SF-6D). Each score was regressed on age, gender, health conditions, and a single SDoH. The SDoH coefficient represents the strength of its association to PROPr and was used to assess known-groups validity. Convergent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlations between different summary scores and Spearman correlations between SDoH coefficients from different summary scores. Results From 4142 participants, all summary scores had statistically significant differences for variables related to education, income, food and financial insecurity, and social interactions. Of the 42 SDoH variables tested, the number of statistically significant variables was 27 for EQ-5D-5L, 17 for HUI Mark 2, 23 for HUI Mark 3, 27 for PROPr, and 27 for SF-6D. The average SDoH coefficients were - 0.086 for EQ-5D-5L, - 0.039 for HUI Mark 2, - 0.063 for HUI Mark 3, - 0.064 for PROPr, and - 0.037 for SF-6D. Despite the difference in magnitude across the measures, Pearson correlations were 0.60 to 0.76 and Spearman correlations were 0.74 to 0.87. Conclusions These results provide evidence of construct validity supporting the use of PROPr monitor population health in the general US population.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 889
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, QUEST DAT REL DOC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, Uniform Crime Reporting Program
  • [4] Population indices measuring health outcomes: A scoping review
    Ashraf, Khalid
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    Teo, Chin Hai
    Goh, Kim Leng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 9 (01)
  • [5] The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12
    Brazier, JE
    Roberts, J
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (09) : 851 - 859
  • [6] Health measurement in the third era of health
    Breslow, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 96 (01) : 17 - 19
  • [7] Brooks RG, 2010, MEASUREMENT VALUATIO
  • [8] The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years
    Cella, David
    Yount, Susan
    Rothrock, Nan
    Gershon, Richard
    Cook, Karon
    Reeve, Bryce
    Ader, Deborah
    Fries, James F.
    Bruce, Bonnie
    Rose, Mattias
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) : S3 - S11
  • [9] Gender differences in health-related quality-of-life are partly explained by sociodemographic and socioeconomic variation between adult men and women in the US: evidence from four US nationally representative data sets
    Cherepanov, Dasha
    Palta, Mari
    Fryback, Dennis G.
    Robert, Stephanie A.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (08) : 1115 - 1124
  • [10] Cohen SB, 2003, MED CARE, V41, P5