Thomas Kuhn and the forgotten practice

被引：0
作者：
Frega, Roberto [1 ]
机构：
[1] CNRS, IMM CEMS, Paris, France
来源：
DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW | 2013年 / 52卷 / 03期
关键词：
INCOMMENSURABILITY; NOTION;
D O I：
10.1017/S0012217313000887
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：421 / 448
页数：28
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   Did Tom Kuhn actually Meet Tom Bayes? [J].
Lefteris Farmakis .
Erkenntnis, 2008, 68 :41-53
[22]   MUST KUHN ALLOW CROSS-PARADIGM EVIDENCE? [J].
Patton, Lydia .
REVUE ROUMAINE DE PHILOSOPHIE, 2023, 67 (02)
[23]   THE EXTRAEPISTEMOLOGICAL INFLUENCE OF KUHN'S STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS [J].
Kurelic, Zoran .
POLITICKA MISAO-CROATIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 47 (01) :142-150
[24]   Kuhn's Incommensurability Thesis: What's the Argument? [J].
Mizrahi, Moti .
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) :361-378
[25]   'Working in a new world': Kuhn, constructivism, and mind-dependence [J].
Massimi, Michela .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2015, 50 :83-89
[26]   KUHN'S INCOMMENSURABILITY THESIS: GOOD EXAMPLES STILL TO BE FOUND [J].
Prelevic, Dusko .
FILOZOFIA NAUKI, 2019, 27 (04) :61-77
[27]   KUHN'S "LINGUISTIC TURN", INCOMMENSURABILITY AND WEAK TAXONOMIC OBJECTIVITY [J].
Stoenescu, Constantin .
REVUE ROUMAINE DE PHILOSOPHIE, 2023, 67 (02)
[28]   Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique [J].
Markus Seidel .
Synthese, 2021, 198 :6023-6051
[29]   Kuhn's two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique [J].
Seidel, Markus .
SYNTHESE, 2021, 198 (SUPPL 25) :6023-6051
[30]   Rediscovering Einstein's legacy: How Einstein anticipates Kuhn and Feyerabend on the nature of science [J].
Oberheim, Eric .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2016, 57 :17-26
12345