Thomas Kuhn and the forgotten practice

被引：0
作者：
Frega, Roberto [1 ]
机构：
[1] CNRS, IMM CEMS, Paris, France
来源：
DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW | 2013年 / 52卷 / 03期
关键词：
INCOMMENSURABILITY; NOTION;
D O I：
10.1017/S0012217313000887
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：421 / 448
页数：28
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   MUST KUHN ALLOW CROSS-PARADIGM EVIDENCE? [J].
Patton, Lydia .
REVUE ROUMAINE DE PHILOSOPHIE, 2023, 67 (02)
[22]   THE EXTRAEPISTEMOLOGICAL INFLUENCE OF KUHN'S STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS [J].
Kurelic, Zoran .
POLITICKA MISAO-CROATIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 47 (01) :142-150
[23]   Kuhn's Incommensurability Thesis: What's the Argument? [J].
Mizrahi, Moti .
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) :361-378
[24]   'Working in a new world': Kuhn, constructivism, and mind-dependence [J].
Massimi, Michela .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2015, 50 :83-89
[25]   KUHN'S INCOMMENSURABILITY THESIS: GOOD EXAMPLES STILL TO BE FOUND [J].
Prelevic, Dusko .
FILOZOFIA NAUKI, 2019, 27 (04) :61-77
[26]   KUHN'S "LINGUISTIC TURN", INCOMMENSURABILITY AND WEAK TAXONOMIC OBJECTIVITY [J].
Stoenescu, Constantin .
REVUE ROUMAINE DE PHILOSOPHIE, 2023, 67 (02)
[27]   Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique [J].
Markus Seidel .
Synthese, 2021, 198 :6023-6051
[28]   Kuhn's two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique [J].
Seidel, Markus .
SYNTHESE, 2021, 198 (SUPPL 25) :6023-6051
[29]   Rediscovering Einstein's legacy: How Einstein anticipates Kuhn and Feyerabend on the nature of science [J].
Oberheim, Eric .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2016, 57 :17-26
[30]   Incommensurability and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: taking Kuhn seriously (vol 12, 24, 2022) [J].
Gefaell, Juan ;
Saborido, Cristian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2022, 12 (02)
12345