Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Evolution and Review

被引:11
作者
Schumer, Erin [1 ]
Perry, Kyle
Melvin, William Scott [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Div Gen & Gastrointestinal Surg, Ctr Minimally Invas Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
minimally invasive esophagectomy; esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; laparoscopic esophagectomy; IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY; THORACOSCOPIC-LAPAROSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; INVERSION ESOPHAGECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; EXPERIENCE; CARCINOMA; DYSPLASIA;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826295a4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Esophageal cancer remains one of the most deadly cancers with a low overall 5-year survival rate of 17%. Surgical options for esophageal cancer are varied, and debate exists on the best option. The literature was searched for articles discussing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE), and articles were chosen at the discretion of the authors. Several studies have shown that MIE has a statistically significant rate of decreased blood loss, increased length of operative time, shorter hospital stay, and overall decreased morbidity. Anastomotic leak, stricture rate, and survival benefit have also been demonstrated to be similar between OE and MIE. As is made apparent by the small amount of literature on MIE, further research must be done to determine outcomes. Although it is likely that MIE does offer benefits when compared with open surgery, it has not been shown in any large-scale comparative studies.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 386
页数:4
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Oncologic Efficacy Is Not Compromised, and May Be Improved with Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy [J].
Berger, Adam C. ;
Bloomenthal, Aaron ;
Weksler, Benny ;
Evans, Nathaniel ;
Chojnacki, Karen A. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Rosato, Ernest L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 212 (04) :560-566
[2]  
Blazeby JM, 2000, CANCER, V88, P1781
[3]  
DEPAULA AL, 1995, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V5, P1
[4]  
Donington Jessica Scott, 2006, Thorac Surg Clin, V16, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.01.002
[5]   Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital's first year experience [J].
Fabian, T. ;
Martin, J. T. ;
McKelvey, A. A. ;
Federico, J. A. .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2008, 21 (03) :220-225
[6]   Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer [J].
Gao, Yongshan ;
Wang, Yun ;
Chen, Longqi ;
Zhao, Yongfan .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 12 (03) :366-369
[7]   High-grade esophageal dysplasia: Long-term survival and quality of life after esophagectomy [J].
Headrick, JR ;
Nichols, FC ;
Miller, DL ;
Allen, MS ;
Trastek, VF ;
Deschamps, C ;
Schleck, CD ;
Thompson, AM ;
Pairolero, PC .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (06) :1697-1702
[8]   Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Trends of Utilization and Associated Outcomes in England [J].
Lazzarino, Antonio Ivan ;
Nagpal, Kamal ;
Bottle, Alex ;
Faiz, Omar ;
Moorthy, Krishna ;
Aylin, Paul .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) :292-298
[9]  
Luketich J D, 1998, JSLS, V2, P243
[10]   Minimally invasive esophagectomy - Outcomes in 222 patients [J].
Luketich, JD ;
Alvelo-Rivera, M ;
Buenaventura, PO ;
Christie, NA ;
McCaughan, JS ;
Litle, VR ;
Schauer, PR ;
Close, JM ;
Fernando, HC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (04) :486-494