Family members' prioritisation of care in residential aged care facilities: A case for individualised care

被引:14
作者
Ludlow, Kristiana [1 ]
Churruca, Kate [1 ]
Ellis, Louise A. [1 ]
Mumford, Virginia [1 ]
Braithwaite, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Level 6,75 Talavera Rd, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
aged care; caregiver burden; carers; decision-making; family-centred care; nursing homes; older people; patient-centred care; qualitative approaches; residential homes; LONG-TERM-CARE; NURSING-HOME; INVOLVEMENT; NURSES; PERSPECTIVE; EXPERIENCE; SETTINGS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.15352
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate family members' prioritisation of care in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Introduction and background Family members are often involved in the care of their older relatives even after these relatives transit to a RACF. Understanding family members' priorities regarding care (i.e., what is most important to them) can provide valuable insights into how to better meet residents' needs. Design A multisite mixed-methods study comprising qualitative methods and Q methodology. The qualitative component of the study was guided by the COREQ checklist. Methods Participants comprised 27 family members of residents living in one of five participating Australian RACFs. Participants rank-ordered 34 cards, each representing an aspect of care, on a predefined grid from "Least important" (-4) to "Most important" (+4). Participants also engaged in a think-aloud task, demographic questionnaire, post-sorting interview and semi-structured interview. Q data were analysed using inverted factor techniques to identify factors that each represent a portion of shared meaning. Factors were interpreted as viewpoints using data from the think-aloud task and interviews. These data were further analysed using inductive content analysis to reveal influences on prioritisation decision-making. Results Three distinct viewpoints were identified through Q methodology: prioritisation of residents' physical needs, maintaining residents' independence, and human connection. Inductive content analysis revealed four influences on prioritisation decision-making: residents' capabilities and support requirements, unmet needs, family bridging the gaps, and family knowledge of residents. Conclusions The study indicated that to meet residents' needs and family members' priorities, individualised approaches to care are warranted. It also demonstrated the vital role family members play in residents' care when needs are not fully met. Relevance to Clinical Practice Strategies to improve individualised care in clinical practice include flexibility of routines, supporting family members' involvement in care, workforce training focused on family-staff communication, and safer staffing ratios.
引用
收藏
页码:3272 / 3285
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DOING Q METHODOLOGIC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, DOING Q METHODOLOGIC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, NAT STAT ETH COND HU
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, QSR International. NVivo 12 Qualitative Data Analysis Software
  • [5] Patients' and relatives' experiences and perspectives of 'Good' and 'Not so Good' quality care
    Attree, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 33 (04) : 456 - 466
  • [6] Family members' responsibilities to nursing home residents: "She is the only mother I got"
    Bern-Klug, Mercedes
    Forbes-Thompson, Sarah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2008, 34 (02): : 43 - 52
  • [7] Borneo A., 2017, Safe and effective staffing: Nursing against the odds
  • [8] Brown S.R., 1993, OPERANT SUBJECTIVITY, V16, P91, DOI DOI 10.22488/OKSTATE.93.100504
  • [9] Charters E., 2003, J ED RES PRACTICE, V12, P68, DOI [DOI 10.26522/BROCKED.V12I2.38, 10.26522/brocked.v1212.38, DOI 10.26522/BROCKED.V1212.38]
  • [10] Commonwealth of Australia, 2019, CAR OLD AUSTR