Application of a Fall Screening Algorithm Stratified Fall Risk But Missed Preventive Opportunities in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Prospective Study

被引:21
作者
Muir, Susan W. [1 ]
Berg, Katherine [2 ]
Chesworth, Bert [3 ]
Klar, Neil [1 ]
Speechley, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
accidental falls; aged; prognosis; risk factors; sensitivity and specificity; CARE; PREDICTION; HEALTHY; PEOPLE; TESTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1097/JPT.0b013e3181ff23cc
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: Evaluate the ability of the American and British Geriatrics Society fall prevention guideline's screening algorithm to identify and stratify future fall risk in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: Prospective cohort of community-dwelling older adults (n = 117) aged 65 to 90 years. Fall history, balance, and gait measured during a comprehensive geriatric assessment at baseline. Falls data were collected monthly for 1 year. The outcomes of any fall and any injurious fall were evaluated. Results: The algorithm stratified participants into 4 hierarchal risk categories. Fall risk was 33% and 68% for the "no intervention" and "comprehensive fall evaluation required" groups respectively. The relative risk estimate for falling comparing participants in the 2 intervention groups was 2.08 (95% CI 1.42-3.05) for any fall and 2.60 (95% CI 1.53-4.42) for any injurious fall. Prognostic accuracy values were: sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI 0.36-0.64) and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.90) for any fall; and sensitivity of 0.56 (95% CI 0.38-0.72) and specificity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.86) for any injurious fall. Conclusions: The algorithm was able to identify and stratify fall risk for each fall outcome, though the values of prognostic accuracy demonstrate moderate clinical utility. The recommendations of fall evaluation for individuals in the highest risk groups appear supported though the recommendation of no intervention in the lowest risk groups may not address their needs for fall prevention interventions. Further evaluation of the algorithm is recommended to refine the identification of fall risk in community-dwelling older adults.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 172
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, REP SEM FALLS CAN DI
[2]  
BERG KO, 1992, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V83, pS7
[3]  
BERG KO, 1992, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V73, P1073
[4]   Managing risk and exerting control: determining follow through with falls prevention [J].
Clemson, L ;
Cusick, A ;
Fozzard, C .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 21 (12) :531-541
[5]   Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening [J].
Deeks, JJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305) :157-162
[6]   Using evaluations of diagnostic tests: Understanding their limitations and making the most of available evidence [J].
Deeks, JJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (07) :761-768
[7]   FALLS IN THE HEALTHY ELDERLY - PREDISPOSING CAUSES [J].
GABELL, A ;
SIMONS, MA ;
NAYAK, USL .
ERGONOMICS, 1985, 28 (07) :965-975
[8]   Monitoring falls in cohort studies of community-dwelling older people: Effect of the recall interval [J].
Ganz, DA ;
Higashi, T ;
Rubenstein, LZ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (12) :2190-2194
[9]   Will my patient fall? [J].
Ganz, David A. ;
Bao, Yeran ;
Shekelle, Paul G. ;
Rubenstein, Laurence Z. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (01) :77-86
[10]   Clinical history and biologic age predicted falls better than objective functional tests [J].
Gerdhem, P ;
Ringsberg, KAM ;
Åkesson, K ;
Obrant, KJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (03) :226-232