A dynamic theory of parliamentary democracy

被引:20
作者
Baron, David P. [3 ]
Diermeier, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Fong, Pohan [4 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Managerial Econ & Decis Sci MEDS, Kellogg Sch Management, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Ford Motor Co, Ctr Global Citizenship, Kellogg Sch Management, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Econ & Finance, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Parliamentary democracy; Proportional representation; Government formation; Policy dynamics; Lack of commitment; Inefficiency; COMPARATIVE POLITICS; GOVERNMENT; REPRESENTATION; INEFFICIENCY; ELECTIONS; POLICY; GOODS;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-011-0625-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents a dynamic model of elections, government formation, and legislation in a parliamentary democracy with proportional representation in which the policy chosen in one period becomes the status quo for the next period. The electorate votes strategically by taking into account the likely governments that parties would form based on their representation and the policies they would choose as a function of the status quo. The status quo thus affects both the election outcomes and the bargaining power of the parties during government formation. A formateur party therefore has incentives to strategically position the current policy to gain an advantage in both the next election and the subsequent bargaining over government formation and policy choice. These incentives can give rise to centrifugal forces that result in policies that are outside the Pareto set of the parties.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 738
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pragmatic Democracy: The Premises of an Empirically Oriented Normative Theory
    Pogrebinschi, Thamy
    [J]. DADOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, 2010, 53 (03): : 657 - 693
  • [42] Religion, Sectarianism, and Democracy: Theory and Evidence from Lebanon
    Hoffman, Michael
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 42 (04) : 1169 - 1200
  • [43] Religion, Sectarianism, and Democracy: Theory and Evidence from Lebanon
    Michael Hoffman
    [J]. Political Behavior, 2020, 42 : 1169 - 1200
  • [44] Election outcomes, legislative representation, and satisfaction with democracy
    Blais, Andre
    Morin-Chasse, Alexandre
    Singh, Shane P.
    [J]. PARTY POLITICS, 2017, 23 (02) : 85 - 95
  • [45] Should Democracy Work through Elections or Sortition?
    Malleson, Tom
    [J]. POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2018, 46 (03) : 401 - 417
  • [46] Polarization congruence and satisfaction with democracy: A multinational investigation
    Erol, Fatih
    Ecevit, Yuksel Alper
    Kocapinar, Gulnur
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2024, 90
  • [47] Satisfaction with Democracy: The Impact of Institutions, Contexts and Attitudes
    Cutler, Fred
    Nuesser, Andrea
    Nyblade, Benjamin
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2023, 56 (01): : 1 - 25
  • [48] Winners, losers, and protest behavior in parliamentary systems
    VanDusky-Allen, Julie
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2017, 54 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [49] PRESIDENTIALIZATION OF PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEMS: COMPARATIVE ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK
    Cakar, Dario Nikic
    [J]. POLITICKA MISAO-CROATIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2009, 46 (02): : 140 - 165
  • [50] Coalition Politics and Parliamentary Oversight in the European Union
    Finke, Daniel
    Herbel, Annika
    [J]. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 2018, 53 (03) : 388 - 415