A dynamic theory of parliamentary democracy

被引:20
作者
Baron, David P. [3 ]
Diermeier, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Fong, Pohan [4 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Managerial Econ & Decis Sci MEDS, Kellogg Sch Management, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Ford Motor Co, Ctr Global Citizenship, Kellogg Sch Management, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Econ & Finance, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Parliamentary democracy; Proportional representation; Government formation; Policy dynamics; Lack of commitment; Inefficiency; COMPARATIVE POLITICS; GOVERNMENT; REPRESENTATION; INEFFICIENCY; ELECTIONS; POLICY; GOODS;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-011-0625-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents a dynamic model of elections, government formation, and legislation in a parliamentary democracy with proportional representation in which the policy chosen in one period becomes the status quo for the next period. The electorate votes strategically by taking into account the likely governments that parties would form based on their representation and the policies they would choose as a function of the status quo. The status quo thus affects both the election outcomes and the bargaining power of the parties during government formation. A formateur party therefore has incentives to strategically position the current policy to gain an advantage in both the next election and the subsequent bargaining over government formation and policy choice. These incentives can give rise to centrifugal forces that result in policies that are outside the Pareto set of the parties.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 738
页数:36
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]  
Duggan J., 2007, DYNAMIC MODEL UNPUB
[22]  
Fong P., 2006, DYNAMICS GOVT UNPUB
[23]   A three-player dynamic majoritarian bargaining game [J].
Kalandrakis, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2004, 116 (02) :294-322
[24]  
Kalandrakis A., 2007, MAJORITY RULE UNPUB
[25]   Regularity of pure strategy equilibrium points in a class of bargaining games [J].
Kalandrakis, T .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2006, 28 (02) :309-329
[26]  
Laver Michael., 1990, MULTIPARTY GOVT POLI
[27]   The provision of public goods under alternative electoral incentives [J].
Lizzeri, A ;
Persico, N .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (01) :225-239
[28]   The political economy of corporate governance [J].
Pagano, M ;
Volpin, PF .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (04) :1005-1030
[29]   The size and scope of government: Comparative politics with rational politicians [J].
Persson, T ;
Tabellini, G .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 43 (4-6) :699-735
[30]   WHY A STUBBORN CONSERVATIVE WOULD RUN A DEFICIT - POLICY WITH TIME-INCONSISTENT PREFERENCES [J].
PERSSON, T ;
SVENSSON, LEO .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1989, 104 (02) :325-345