IDEALIZATION, JUSTICE, AND THE FORM OF PRACTICAL REASON

被引:3
作者
Hope, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Philosophy, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
ideal theory; idealization; justice; practical reason; moral concepts; IDEAL;
D O I
10.1017/S0265052516000224
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Current debates about ideal theory and idealization in modern moral and political philosophy do not typically scrutinize the form of reflection itself. This is an unfortunate oversight: assumptions about the form of reflection shape the positions defended in those debates. I argue that the appropriate form of reflection on the nature and justification of standards of justice and morality is the form of practical reason. I further argue that the form of practical reason cannot support many of the idealizations typically deployed in modern moral and political philosophy.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 392
页数:21
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Albertzart Maike, 2014, MORAL PRINCIPLES, P94
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, RESCUING JUSTICE EQU, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674262713
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1962, IDEM RATIONALISM POL
  • [4] Broome John, 2013, RATIONALITY REASONIN, P23
  • [5] Engstrom, 2000, INTENTION
  • [6] Engstrom S, 2013, CONSTRUCTIVISM IN ETHICS, P133
  • [7] Engstrom Stephen, 2009, FORM PRACTICAL KNOWL, P54
  • [8] Utopophobia
    Estlund, David
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2014, 42 (02) : 113 - 134
  • [9] Justice in ideal theory: A refutation
    Farrelly, Colin
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES, 2007, 55 (04) : 844 - 864
  • [10] Finlayson Lorna., 2015, The Political is Political: Conformity and the Illusion of Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy London