Efficacy and Safety of Massage for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:62
作者
Perlman, Adam [1 ]
Fogerite, Susan Gould [2 ]
Glass, Oliver [1 ]
Bechard, Elizabeth [1 ]
Ali, Ather [3 ]
Njike, Valentine Y. [4 ]
Pieper, Carl [1 ]
Dmitrieva, Natalia O. [5 ]
Luciano, Alison [1 ]
Rosenberger, Lisa [4 ]
Keever, Teresa [1 ]
Milak, Carl [2 ]
Finkelstein, Eric A. [6 ]
Mahon, Gwendolyn [2 ]
Campanile, Giovanni [7 ]
Cotter, Ann [8 ]
Katz, David L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Integrat Med, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Rutgers Sch Hlth Profess, Inst Complementary & Alternat Med, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Griffin Hosp, Yale Griffin Prevent Res Ctr, Derby, CT USA
[5] No Arizona Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[6] Duke NUS Med Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Chambers Ctr Well Being, Atlantic Integrat Med Associates, Morristown, NJ USA
[8] Vet Adm New Jersey Hlth Care Ctr, E Orange, NJ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
massage; osteoarthritis; arthritis; knee pain; musculoskeletal pain; TAI-CHI; WOMAC; PAIN; EPIDEMIOLOGY; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; ARTHRITIS; THERAPY; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-018-4763-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundCurrent treatment options for knee osteoarthritis have limited effectiveness and potentially adverse side effects. Massage may offer a safe and effective complement to the management of knee osteoarthritis.ObjectiveExamine effects of whole-body massage on knee osteoarthritis, compared to active control (light-touch) and usual care.DesignMultisite RCT assessing the efficacy of massage compared to light-touch and usual care in adults with knee osteoarthritis, with assessments at baseline and weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 52. Subjects in massage or light-touch groups received eight weekly treatments, then were randomized to biweekly intervention or usual care to week 52. The original usual care group continued to week 24. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.ParticipantsFive hundred fifty-one screened for eligibility, 222 adults with knee osteoarthritis enrolled, 200 completed 8-week assessments, and 175 completed 52-week assessments.InterventionSixty minutes of protocolized full-body massage or light-touch.Main MeasuresPrimary: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. Secondary: visual analog pain scale, PROMIS Pain Interference, knee range of motion, and timed 50-ft walk.Key ResultsAt 8weeks, massage significantly improved WOMAC Global scores compared to light-touch (-8.16, 95% CI=-13.50 to -2.81) and usual care (-9.55, 95% CI=-14.66 to -4.45). Additionally, massage improved pain, stiffness, and physical function WOMAC subscale scores compared to light-touch (p<0.001; p=0.04; p=0.02, respectively) and usual care (p<0.001; p=0.002; p=0.002; respectively). At 52weeks, the omnibus test of any group difference in the change in WOMAC Global from baseline to 52weeks was not significant (p=0.707, df=3), indicating no significant difference in change across groups. Adverse events were minimal.ConclusionsEfficacy of symptom relief and safety of weekly massage make it an attractive short-term treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. Longer-term biweekly dose maintained improvement, but did not provide additional benefit beyond usual care post 8-week treatment.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT01537484
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 386
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Development of a manualized protocol of massage therapy for clinical trials in osteoarthritis
    Ali, Ather
    Kahn, Janet
    Rosenberger, Lisa
    Perlman, Adam I.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2012, 13
  • [2] DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING OF OSTEOARTHRITIS - CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE
    ALTMAN, R
    ASCH, E
    BLOCH, D
    BOLE, G
    BORENSTEIN, D
    BRANDT, K
    CHRISTY, W
    COOKE, TD
    GREENWALD, R
    HOCHBERG, M
    HOWELL, D
    KAPLAN, D
    KOOPMAN, W
    LONGLEY, S
    MANKIN, H
    MCSHANE, DJ
    MEDSGER, T
    MEENAN, R
    MIKKELSEN, W
    MOSKOWITZ, R
    MURPHY, W
    ROTHSCHILD, B
    SEGAL, M
    SOKOLOFF, L
    WOLFE, F
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1986, 29 (08): : 1039 - 1049
  • [3] Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    Cook, Karon F.
    Jensen, Mark P.
    Chen, Wen-Hung
    Choi, Seung
    Revicki, Dennis
    Cella, David
    Rothrock, Nan
    Keefe, Francis
    Callahan, Leigh
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    [J]. PAIN, 2010, 150 (01) : 173 - 182
  • [4] The million visual analog scale - Its utility for predicting tertiary rehabilitation outcomes
    Anagnostis, C
    Mayer, TG
    Gatchel, RJ
    Proctor, TJ
    [J]. SPINE, 2003, 28 (10) : 1051 - 1060
  • [5] Current evidence for osteoarthritis treatments
    Anandacoomarasamy, Ananthila
    March, Lyn
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE, 2010, 2 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [6] Angst F, 2001, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V45, P384, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<384::AID-ART352>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-0
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, PREV DOCT DIAGN ARTH
  • [9] Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology
    Arden, N
    Nevitt, MC
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01): : 3 - 25
  • [10] Barnes Patricia M, 2008, Natl Health Stat Report, P1