Strategic principles for smart city development: A multiple case study analysis of European best practices

被引:186
作者
Mora, Luca [1 ]
Deakin, Mark [2 ]
Reid, Alasdair [2 ]
机构
[1] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Business Sch, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Smart city; Sustainable urban development; Urban innovation; Case study research; Best practices; Strategic principles; TRIPLE-HELIX; BIG DATA; CITIES; INNOVATION; MODEL; INFRASTRUCTURE; TECHNOLOGIES; RESILIENCE; HACKATHONS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.035
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recent studies reveal a deep-rooted division in research on smart cities, which surfaces as a set of dichotomies that question whether smart city development should be based on a: (1) technology-led or holistic strategy; (2) double or quadruple-helix model of collaboration; (3) top-down or bottom-up approach; (4) mono-dimensional or integrated intervention logic. These dichotomies generate a critical knowledge gap because they suggest divergent hypotheses on what principles need to be considered when implementing strategies for enabling smart city development. This paper starts filling such a gap by reporting on the findings of a multiple case study analysis which is conducted into European best practices. In meeting this aim, four European cities considered to be leaders in the field of smart city development are analyzed to test the validity of the hypotheses emerging from each dichotomy. These cities are Amsterdam, Barcelona, Helsinki and Vienna. The results of this best practice analysis offer a series of critical insights into what strategic principles drive smart city development in Europe and generate scientific knowledge which helps to overcome the dichotomous nature of smart city research.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 97
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Value-Added Development of Government Information Resources of A Smart City: A Case Study [J].
Yang, Zhang-wei ;
Huang, Shao-bin .
2016 IEEE 20th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 2016, :643-646
[32]   "SMART WATER IN SMART CITY": A CASE STUDY [J].
Karwot, Janusz ;
Kazmierczak, Jan ;
Wyczolkowski, Ryszard ;
Paszkowski, Waldemar ;
Przystalka, Piotr .
WATER, RESOURCES, FOREST, MARINE AND OCEAN ECOSYSTEMS CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL I, 2016, :851-+
[33]   Toward Sustainable Governance: Strategic Analysis of the Smart City Seoul Portal in Korea [J].
Yoo, Yejin .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
[34]   Case-based reasoning for selection of the best practices in low-carbon city development [J].
Zhenhua Huang ;
Hongqin Fan ;
Liyin Shen .
Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2019, 6 :416-432
[35]   Analysis of Big Data Development in Jakarta Smart City [J].
Izzuddin, Nur ;
Arifin, Ajib Setyo .
2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, CONTROL, INFORMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS (IC3INA), 2018, :175-180
[36]   The role of intermediary spaces in crafting the smart city industry and urban futures: a case study of Taipei City [J].
Lin, Cheng-Yi .
URBAN GEOGRAPHY, 2025,
[37]   Factors impinge on the development of a smart city: a field study [J].
Jothimani, Priya ;
Chenniappan, Palanisamy ;
Chidambaranathan, Vinothini .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (57) :86298-86307
[38]   Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives [J].
Pereira, Gabriela Viale ;
Cunha, Maria Alexandra ;
Lampoltshammer, Thomas J. ;
Parycek, Peter ;
Testa, Mauricio Gregianin .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 23 (03) :526-553
[39]   Open Data and Open Source Enabling Smart City Development: A Case Study in Hame Region [J].
Jussila, Jari ;
Kukkamaki, Joni ;
Mantyneva, Mikko ;
Heinisuo, Juuso .
TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 9 (09) :25-34
[40]   European plans for the smart city: from theories and rules to logistics test case [J].
Russo, Francesco ;
Rindone, Corrado ;
Panuccio, Paola .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2016, 24 (09) :1709-1726