Strategic principles for smart city development: A multiple case study analysis of European best practices

被引:186
作者
Mora, Luca [1 ]
Deakin, Mark [2 ]
Reid, Alasdair [2 ]
机构
[1] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Business Sch, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Smart city; Sustainable urban development; Urban innovation; Case study research; Best practices; Strategic principles; TRIPLE-HELIX; BIG DATA; CITIES; INNOVATION; MODEL; INFRASTRUCTURE; TECHNOLOGIES; RESILIENCE; HACKATHONS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.035
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recent studies reveal a deep-rooted division in research on smart cities, which surfaces as a set of dichotomies that question whether smart city development should be based on a: (1) technology-led or holistic strategy; (2) double or quadruple-helix model of collaboration; (3) top-down or bottom-up approach; (4) mono-dimensional or integrated intervention logic. These dichotomies generate a critical knowledge gap because they suggest divergent hypotheses on what principles need to be considered when implementing strategies for enabling smart city development. This paper starts filling such a gap by reporting on the findings of a multiple case study analysis which is conducted into European best practices. In meeting this aim, four European cities considered to be leaders in the field of smart city development are analyzed to test the validity of the hypotheses emerging from each dichotomy. These cities are Amsterdam, Barcelona, Helsinki and Vienna. The results of this best practice analysis offer a series of critical insights into what strategic principles drive smart city development in Europe and generate scientific knowledge which helps to overcome the dichotomous nature of smart city research.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 97
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gold Coast smart city strategy: informed by local planning priorities and international smart city best practices
    Alizadeh, Tooran
    Irajifar, Leila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 9 (02) : 153 - 173
  • [22] Regional Smart City Development Focus: The South Korean National Strategic Smart City Program
    Yang, Jeyun
    Kwon, Youngsang
    Kim, Daehwan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 7193 - 7210
  • [23] The Scandinavian Third Way as a Proposal for Sustainable Smart City Development-A Case Study of Aarhus City
    Baraniewicz-Kotasinska, Sabina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [24] Potential pitfalls of smart city development: A study on parking mobile applications (apps) in Hong Kong
    Ma, Ruiqu
    Lam, Patrick T., I
    Leung, C. K.
    TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2018, 35 (06) : 1580 - 1592
  • [25] Gendering the smart city: A case study of Sejong City, Korea
    Chang, Ji-in
    Choi, Jeongsun
    An, Hyunjin
    Chung, Hye-Young
    CITIES, 2022, 120
  • [26] A Preliminary Survey on Smart Specialization Platforms: Evaluation of European Best Practices
    Chiordi, Simone
    Desogus, Giulia
    Garau, Chiara
    Nesi, Paolo
    Zamperlin, Paola
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, ICCSA 2022 WORKSHOPS, PT VI, 2022, 13382 : 67 - 84
  • [27] Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness
    Engelbert, Jiska
    van Zoonen, Liesbet
    Hirzalla, Fadi
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 142 : 347 - 353
  • [28] How to achieve sustainable development of smart city: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis
    Luo, Xizi
    Huang, Rui
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024,
  • [29] Big data applied to strategic digital city: study on the volume of data in the smart city applications
    Ferlin, Edson Pedro
    Rezende, Denis Alcides
    REVISTA GESTAO & TECNOLOGIA-JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 19 (02): : 175 - 194
  • [30] Internet of Things Applications and challenges in smart cities: a case study of IBM smart city projects
    Scuotto, Veronica
    Ferraris, Alberto
    Bresciani, Stefano
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (02) : 357 - 367