共 32 条
Azelnidipine plus olmesartan versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on arterial stiffness and cardiac function in hypertensive patients: a randomized trial
被引:20
作者:
Takami, Takeshi
[1
]
Saito, Yoshihiko
[2
]
机构:
[1] Clin Jingumae, Dept Internal Med, Kashihara, Nara 6340804, Japan
[2] Nara Med Univ, Dept Internal Med 1, Kashihara, Nara 634, Japan
来源:
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY
|
2013年
/
7卷
关键词:
central blood pressure;
arterial stiffness;
left ventricular mass index;
left ventricular diastolic function;
olmesartan/azelnidipine;
VENTRICULAR DIASTOLIC DYSFUNCTION;
CENTRAL AORTIC PRESSURE;
HEART-FAILURE;
PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE;
NONINVASIVE ESTIMATION;
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK;
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES;
PULSE PRESSURE;
BLOOD-PRESSURE;
HYPERTROPHY;
D O I:
10.2147/DDDT.S42338
中图分类号:
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号:
100701 ;
摘要:
Purpose: To compare the long-term effects of olmesartan combined with either azelnidipine or amlodipine on central blood pressure (CBP), left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI), LV diastolic function (e' velocity, E/e' ratio, E/A ratio) and arterial stiffness (brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity [baPWV] and augmentation index normalized for a heart rate of 75 bpm [AIx]). Patients and methods: Patients with systolic BP >= 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP >= 90 mmHg received olmesartan monotherapy (20 mg/day) for 12 weeks. They were then randomly assigned to fixed-dose add-on therapy with azelnidipine (16 mg/day; n = 26) or amlodipine (5 mg/day; n = 26) for a further 2 years. CBP, LVMI, e' velocity, E/e' ratio, E/A ratio, baPWV, and AIx were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 2 years. Results: Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The decrease in brachial BP over 2 years was similar in both groups. CBP, LVMI, E/e' ratio, baPWV, and AIx decreased significantly, and the E/A ratio and e' velocity increased significantly in both groups. The decreases in CBP (P, 0.001), AIx (P, 0.001), baPWV (P, 0.001), LVMI (P, 0.001), and E/e' (P = 0.002) as well as the increase in E/A ratio (P = 0.03) over 2 years were significantly greater in the olmesartan/azelnidipine group than in the olmesartan/amlodipine group. Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that the changes in baPWV (beta = 0.41, P, 0.001) and CBP (beta = 0.47, P = 0.01) were independently associated with the change in LVMI, the change in baPWV (beta = 0.25, P, 0.001) was independently associated with the change in E/e' ratio, and the changes in baPWV (beta = 0.21, P = 0.001) and AIx (beta = 0.25, P = 0.03) were independently associated with the change in E/A ratio. Conclusion: Treatment with olmesartan/azelnidipine for 2 years resulted in greater -improvements in CBP, LVMI, and LV diastolic function, and arterial stiffness compared with olmesartan/amlodipine. Improvements in LV diastolic function were associated with improvements in arterial stiffness.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 183
页数:9
相关论文