Bioequivalence of generic and brand-name levothyroxine products in the treatment of hypothyroidism

被引:133
作者
Dong, BJ
Hauck, WW
Gambertoglio, JG
Gee, L
White, JR
Bubp, JL
Greenspan, FS
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,MED CTR,DEPT BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,DIV BIOSTAT,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,MED CTR,DEPT MED,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1997年 / 277卷 / 15期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.277.15.1205
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To compare relative bioavailability of Synthroid, Levoxine (Levoxine has been renamed Levoxyl), and 2 generic levothyroxine sodium preparations. Design.-Single-blind (primary investigators blinded), randomized, 4-way crossover trial. Setting.-Ambulatory care. Patients.-Twenty-two women with hypothyroidism who were clinically and chemically euthyroid and were receiving levothyroxine sodium, 0.1 or 0.15 mg. Interventions.-All patients received each of the 4 levothyroxine products for 6-week periods in the same dosage as their prestudy regimen with no washout period. The order of the drug sequences was randomly determined before study initiation. Main Outcome Measures.-Area under the curve, time to peak serum concentrations, and peak serum concentrations of thyroxine, triiodothyronine, and free thyroxine index for all 4 products. Results.-All data analyses were completed prior to unblinding of the product codes. No significant differences between the 4 products were found in area under the curve or peak serum concentrations of total thyroxine, total triiodothyronine, or free thyroxine index, Although Synthroid produced a more rapid rise in total serum triiodothyronine concentration and a higher total peak serum triiodothyronine concentration than the other products, these differences were not statistically significant (P=.08). The Food and Drug Administration criterion for relative bioequivalence within 90% confidence intervals (0.8-1.25) was demonstrated (P<.05) for all pairs of products, Relative bioequivalence of 0.95 to 1.07 was demonstrated, tighter than the current bioequivalence criterion for oral formulations. Conclusions.-The 4 generic and brand-name levothyroxine preparations studied are different but are bioequivalent by current Food and Drug Administration criteria and are interchangeable in the majority of patients receiving thyroxine replacement therapy. Further investigation is required to determine whether our results are equally applicable to all existing levothyroxine preparations.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1213
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] THYROID-HORMONE LEVELS AFFECTED BY TIME OF BLOOD-SAMPLING IN THYROXINE-TREATED PATIENTS
    AIN, KB
    PUCINO, F
    SHIVER, TM
    BANKS, SM
    [J]. THYROID, 1993, 3 (02) : 81 - 85
  • [2] CONSIDERATION OF INDIVIDUAL BIOEQUIVALENCE
    ANDERSON, S
    HAUCK, WW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1990, 18 (03): : 259 - 273
  • [3] BERG JA, 1992, J CLIN PHARMACOL, V32, P1135
  • [4] LEVOTHYROXINE BIOEQUIVALENCE - COMMENT
    BERG, JA
    WILSON, JT
    [J]. DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1989, 23 (10): : 812 - 813
  • [5] BLOUIN RA, 1989, CLIN PHARMACY, V8, P588
  • [6] DETERMINATION OF SODIUM LEVOTHYROXINE IN BULK, TABLET, AND INJECTION FORMULATIONS BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY
    BROWER, JF
    TOLER, DY
    REEPMEYER, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1984, 73 (09) : 1315 - 1317
  • [7] CARMEYER NR, 1991, AM J HOSP PHARM, V48, P735
  • [8] Chow S-C., 1992, DESIGN ANAL BIOAVAIL
  • [9] Cochran W.G., 1957, EXPER, P117
  • [10] LEVOTHYROXINE SODIUM TABLETS - CHEMICAL EQUIVALENCE AND BIOEQUIVALENCE
    CURRY, SH
    GUMS, JG
    WILLIAMS, LL
    CURRY, RW
    WOLFSON, BB
    [J]. DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY, 1988, 22 (7-8): : 589 - 591