Argument map for carbon capture and storage

被引:30
作者
van Egmond, Sander [1 ]
Hekkert, Marko P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Sustainabil Inst, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
CO2 capture and storage; Public discourse; Arguments; Validity; CCS chain; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CO2; CAPTURE; CCS; ENERGY; PART; GASIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) can contribute to the deep CO2 cuts which are necessary to achieve climate change targets. There is, however, a strong public debate whether CCS should be implemented. In this article we give an overview of the arguments for and against based on the opinion of Dutch stakeholders. CCS is an umbrella term for a wide range of different configurations of separate technologies. Some arguments are applicable in general for all CCS chains; some are only valid for a particular configuration. In this paper we will discuss these arguments in the context of the background of different CCS configurations. The argument that CCS costs a lot of extra energy, for instance, is valid for the power sector, not for gas treatment. A good understanding of the CCS debate and the arguments used may help with developing a better energy policy and may give direction to future research and technology development. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S148 / S159
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Reuters
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, C VOLUME C INT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ZEMBLA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 2010 SURV EN RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, FALS HOP WHY CARB CA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Energy Technology Perspectives 2010
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Fully Decarbonising Europe's Energy System by 2050
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EC CLIMATE CHANGE
[9]  
Arentsen M.J., 2006, ENERGY ENV, V17, P3
[10]  
Argumentenfabriek, 2010, ARG MAP CO2 CAPT STO