Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study

被引:8
作者
Hirko, Kelly A. [1 ]
Lennon, Sue A. [2 ]
Lucas, Todd [1 ,3 ]
Miller, David C. [4 ]
Jimbo, Masahito [4 ,5 ]
Leibfritz, Stephanie J. [2 ]
Knoff, Suzanne J. [2 ]
Janney, Carol A. [6 ,7 ]
Berg, Paul D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 909 Fee Rd, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] MidMichigan Hlth, Midland, MI USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Div Publ Hlth, Flint, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Family Med, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychiat, Coll Human Med West Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[7] Pine Rest Christian Mental Hlth Serv, Grand Rapids, MI USA
关键词
FECAL-IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; URBAN DIFFERENCES; UNITED-STATES; PRIMARY-CARE; OUTREACH; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.019
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to prevent or detect early colorectal cancer and reduce mortality; yet, adherence to screening recommendations remains low, particularly in rural settings. Study design: RCT. Setting/participants: Adults (n=7,812) aged 50-75 years and due for colorectal cancer screening in a largely rural health system were randomly assigned to either the intervention (n=3,906) or the control (n=3,906) group in September 2016, with analysis following through 2018. Intervention: A mailed motivational messaging screening reminder letter with an option to call and request a free at-home fecal immunochemical screening test (intervention) or the standard invitation letter detailing that the individual was due for screening (control). Multifaceted motivational messaging emphasized colorectal cancer preventability and the ease and affordability of screening, and communicated a limited supply of test kits. Main outcome measures: Colorectal cancer screening participation within 6 months after mailed invitation was ascertained from the electronic medical record. Results: Colorectal cancer screening participation was significantly improved in the intervention (30.1%) vs the usual care control group (22.5%; p<0.001). Individuals randomized to the intervention group had 49% higher odds of being screened over follow-up than those randomized to the control group (OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.34, 1.65). A total of 13.2 screening invitations were needed to accomplish 1 additional screening over the usual care. Of the 233 fecal immunochemical test kits mailed to participants, 154 (66.1%) were returned, and 18 (11.7%) tested positive. Conclusions: A mailed motivational messaging letter with a low-cost screening alternative increased colorectal cancer screening in this largely rural community with generally poor adherence to screening recommendations. Mailed colorectal cancer screening reminders using motivational messaging may be an effective method for increasing screening and reducing rural colorectal cancer disparities. (C) 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 411
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   Effect of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Holme, Oyvind ;
Loberg, Magnus ;
Kalager, Mette ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Hernan, Miguel A. ;
Aas, Eline ;
Eide, Tor J. ;
Skovlund, Eva ;
Schneede, Jorn ;
Tveit, Kjell Magne ;
Hoff, Geir .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (06) :606-615
[22]   Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska [J].
Hughes, Alejandro G. ;
Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu ;
Schnell, Paulette ;
Soliman, Amr S. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2015, 40 (06) :1065-1074
[23]  
Inadomi JM, 2012, ARCH INTERN MED, V172, P575, DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332
[24]   Program to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Low-Income, Racially Diverse Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Jean-Jacques, Muriel ;
Kaleba, Erin O. ;
Gatta, John L. ;
Gracia, Gabriela ;
Ryan, Elizabeth R. ;
Choucair, Bechara N. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 10 (05) :412-417
[25]   A Media and Clinic Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ohio Appalachia [J].
Krok-Schoen, Jessica L. ;
Katz, Mira L. ;
Oliveri, Jill M. ;
Young, Gregory S. ;
Pennell, Michael L. ;
Reiter, Paul L. ;
Plascak, Jesse J. ;
Slater, Michael D. ;
Krieger, Janice L. ;
Tatum, Cathy M. ;
Paskett, Electra D. .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
[26]   Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris ;
Knudsen, Amy B. ;
Brenner, Hermann .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2011, 33 (01) :88-100
[27]   A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Rural Family Medicine: An Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Study [J].
Levy, Barcey T. ;
Xu, Yinghui ;
Daly, Jeanette M. ;
Ely, John W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (05) :486-497
[28]   Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Tests Plus Educational Materials to Improve Colon Cancer Screening Rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Practices [J].
Levy, Barcey T. ;
Daly, Jeanette M. ;
Xu, Yinghui ;
Ely, John W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (01) :73-82
[29]  
LIFF JM, 1991, CANCER, V67, P1454, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910301)67:5<1454::AID-CNCR2820670533>3.0.CO
[30]  
2-K