Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study

被引:7
作者
Hirko, Kelly A. [1 ]
Lennon, Sue A. [2 ]
Lucas, Todd [1 ,3 ]
Miller, David C. [4 ]
Jimbo, Masahito [4 ,5 ]
Leibfritz, Stephanie J. [2 ]
Knoff, Suzanne J. [2 ]
Janney, Carol A. [6 ,7 ]
Berg, Paul D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 909 Fee Rd, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] MidMichigan Hlth, Midland, MI USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Div Publ Hlth, Flint, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Family Med, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychiat, Coll Human Med West Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[7] Pine Rest Christian Mental Hlth Serv, Grand Rapids, MI USA
关键词
FECAL-IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; URBAN DIFFERENCES; UNITED-STATES; PRIMARY-CARE; OUTREACH; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.019
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to prevent or detect early colorectal cancer and reduce mortality; yet, adherence to screening recommendations remains low, particularly in rural settings. Study design: RCT. Setting/participants: Adults (n=7,812) aged 50-75 years and due for colorectal cancer screening in a largely rural health system were randomly assigned to either the intervention (n=3,906) or the control (n=3,906) group in September 2016, with analysis following through 2018. Intervention: A mailed motivational messaging screening reminder letter with an option to call and request a free at-home fecal immunochemical screening test (intervention) or the standard invitation letter detailing that the individual was due for screening (control). Multifaceted motivational messaging emphasized colorectal cancer preventability and the ease and affordability of screening, and communicated a limited supply of test kits. Main outcome measures: Colorectal cancer screening participation within 6 months after mailed invitation was ascertained from the electronic medical record. Results: Colorectal cancer screening participation was significantly improved in the intervention (30.1%) vs the usual care control group (22.5%; p<0.001). Individuals randomized to the intervention group had 49% higher odds of being screened over follow-up than those randomized to the control group (OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.34, 1.65). A total of 13.2 screening invitations were needed to accomplish 1 additional screening over the usual care. Of the 233 fecal immunochemical test kits mailed to participants, 154 (66.1%) were returned, and 18 (11.7%) tested positive. Conclusions: A mailed motivational messaging letter with a low-cost screening alternative increased colorectal cancer screening in this largely rural community with generally poor adherence to screening recommendations. Mailed colorectal cancer screening reminders using motivational messaging may be an effective method for increasing screening and reducing rural colorectal cancer disparities. (C) 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 411
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] American Cancer Society, 2019, Cancer treatment and survivorship facts and figures 2019-2021, DOI DOI 10.1080/15398285.2012.701177
  • [2] American Cancer Society, 2017, NAT COL CANC RIUNT 8
  • [3] American Cancer Society, 2017, COL CAC FACTS FIG 20
  • [4] Comparative Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Adherence to Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Baker, David W.
    Brown, Tiffany
    Buchanan, David R.
    Weil, Jordan
    Balsley, Kate
    Ranalli, Lauren
    Lee, Ji Young
    Cameron, Kenzie A.
    Ferreira, M. Rosario
    Stephens, Quinn
    Goldman, Shira N.
    Rademaker, Alred
    Wolf, Michael S.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (08) : 1235 - 1241
  • [5] Receipt of Cancer Screening Services: Surprising Results for Some Rural Minorities
    Bennett, Kevin J.
    Probst, Janice C.
    Bellinger, Jessica D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2012, 28 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [6] Screening for Colorectal Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
    Grossman, David C.
    Curry, Susan J.
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Epling, John W., Jr.
    Garcia, Francisco A. R.
    Gillman, Matthew W.
    Harper, Diane M.
    Kemper, Alex R.
    Krist, Alex H.
    Kurth, Ann E.
    Landefeld, C. Seth
    Mangione, Carol M.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Phillips, William R.
    Phipps, Maureen G.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Siu, Albert L.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (23): : 2564 - 2575
  • [7] Blake KD, 2017, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V26, P992, DOI [10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0092, 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092]
  • [8] Rural and urban differences in stage at diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancers
    Campbell, NC
    Elliott, AM
    Sharp, L
    Ritchie, LD
    Cassidy, J
    Little, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 84 (07) : 910 - 914
  • [9] Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities for Rural Minorities in the United States
    Cole, Allison M.
    Jackson, J. Elizabeth
    Doescher, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2013, 4 (02) : 106 - 111
  • [10] Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Vollmer, William M.
    Taplin, Stephen H.
    Keast, Erin M.
    Fields, Scott
    Green, Beverly B.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (09) : 1174 - 1181