Recalibration and validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in an Asian population: the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort study

被引:14
作者
Choi, Jae Shin [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Myoung-Hee [2 ]
Kim, Yong Chul [3 ]
Lim, Youn-Hee [4 ]
Joo, Hyun [5 ]
Kim, Dong Ki [3 ,9 ]
Park, Jae Yoon [6 ]
Noh, Junhyug [7 ]
Lee, Jung Pyo [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Pyeongtaek St Marys Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Pyeongtaek Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Eulji Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Dent Hyg, Seongnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Environm Med, Med Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Environm Inst, Future Environm Strategy Res Grp, Sejong Si, South Korea
[6] Dongguk Univ, Dept Internal Med, Ilsan Hosp, Goyang Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[7] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Engn, Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Boramae Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ICD-9-CM; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-70624-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Weights assigned to comorbidities in predicting mortality may vary based on the type of index disease and advances in the management of comorbidities. We aimed to develop a modified version of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) using an Asian nationwide database (mCCI-A), enabling the precise prediction of mortality rates in this population. The main data source used in this study was the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) obtained from the National Health Insurance database, which includes health insurance claims filed between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2013, in Korea. Of the 1,025,340 individuals included in the NHIS-NSC, 570,716 patients who were hospitalized at least once were analyzed in this study. In total, 399,502 patients, accounting for 70% of the cohort, were assigned to the development cohort, and the remaining patients (n=171,214) were assigned to the validation cohort. The mCCI-A scores were calculated by summing the weights assigned to individual comorbidities according to their relative prognostic significance determined by a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. The modified index was validated in the same cohort. The Cox proportional hazard model provided reassigned severity weights for 17 comorbidities that significantly predicted mortality. Both the CCI and mCCI-A were correlated with mortality. However, compared with the CCI, the mCCI-A showed modest but significant increases in the c statistics. According to the analyses using continuous net reclassification improvement, the mCCI-A improved the net mortality risk reclassification by 44.0% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 41.6-46.5; p<0.001). The mCCI-A facilitates better risk stratification of mortality rates in Korean inpatients than the CCI, suggesting that the mCCI-A may be a preferable index for use in clinical practice and statistical analyses in epidemiological studies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Comorbidity assessment in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis using the index of coexistent disease [J].
Athienites, NV ;
Miskulin, DC ;
Fernandez, G ;
Bunnapradist, S ;
Simon, G ;
Landa, M ;
Schmid, CH ;
Greenfield, S ;
Levey, AS ;
Meyer, KB .
SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2000, 13 (05) :320-326
[2]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[3]   DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE MODIFIED CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX IN INCIDENT PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS: A NATIONAL POPULATION-BASED APPROACH [J].
Cho, Hyunjeong ;
Kim, Myoung-Hee ;
Kim, Hyo Jin ;
Park, Jae Yoon ;
Ryu, Dong-Ryeol ;
Lee, Hajeong ;
Lee, Jung Pyo ;
Lim, Chun-Soo ;
Kim, Kyoung Hoon ;
Oh, Kook-Hwan ;
Joo, Kwon Wook ;
Kim, Yon Su ;
Kim, Dong Ki .
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 37 (01) :94-102
[4]  
Christensen Steffen, 2011, Clin Epidemiol, V3, P203, DOI 10.2147/CLEP.S20247
[5]   Comparison of different comorbidity measures for use with administrative data in predicting short- and long-term mortality [J].
Chu, Yu-Tseng ;
Ng, Yee-Yung ;
Wu, Shiao-Chi .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
[6]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[7]   Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases [J].
DHoore, W ;
Bouckaert, A ;
Tilquin, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (12) :1429-1433
[8]   Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis patients [J].
Fried, L ;
Bernardini, J ;
Piraino, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2001, 37 (02) :337-342
[9]   Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data [J].
Ghali, WA ;
Hall, RE ;
Rosen, AK ;
Ash, AS ;
Moskowitz, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (03) :273-278
[10]  
Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO