What fatal occupational accident investigators can learn from fatal aircraft accident investigations

被引:8
作者
Vuorio, Alpo [1 ,2 ]
Rantonen, Jarmo [2 ]
Johnson, Christopher [3 ]
Ollila, Tapani [2 ]
Salminen, Simo [4 ]
Braithwaite, Graham [5 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Ctr Mehilainen Airport, Vantaa, Finland
[2] FIOH, Lappeenranta, Finland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Sch Comp Sci, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[4] FIOH, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Cranfield Univ, Safety & Accid Investigat Ctr, Dept Air Transport, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
关键词
Accident; Occupational; Safety; Investigation; Aircraft; Fatal; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.009
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Our aim is to provide an overview of what international aircraft accident investigation practises could teach fatal occupational accident (FOA) investigators. The main purpose of an accident investigation is to prevent future accidents. This aim is easier to achieve if investigations are independent; biases and external pressures can place undue influence on particular recommendations. So far, independence has been easier to achieve in aviation investigations than in fatal occupational accident investigations. In FOAs, tensions often arise between different stakeholders including but not limited to industry regulators, police agencies, industry bodies, trades unions, insurance companies, etc. There are also a host of practical problems that complicate key activities in FOA investigations, including the need to prevent the contamination of evidence in the immediate aftermath of an accident. We argue that greater emphasis needs to be placed on the independence of FOA investigations and that this will help move the emphasis of recommendations from the worker level (sharp end) to the workplace and community system level (blunt end). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 369
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SAF SCI
[2]  
Brenna Morris., 2013, 4th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe), P1
[3]   Results and lessons learned from the ESReDA's Accident Investigation Working Group Introducing article to "Safety Science" special issue on "Industrial Events Investigation" [J].
Dechy, Nicolas ;
Dien, Yves ;
Funnemark, Espen ;
Roed-Larsen, Sverre ;
Stoop, John ;
Valvisto, Tarja ;
Arellanoi, Ana Lisa Vetere .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012, 50 (06) :1380-1391
[4]  
Dismukes R.K., 2007, LIMITS EXPERTISE RET
[5]  
ESReDA, 2009, GUID SAF INV ACC, P1
[6]   Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety culture [J].
Goh, Yang Miang ;
Brown, Helen ;
Spickett, Jeffery .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2010, 48 (03) :302-309
[7]  
Haddon W Jr, 1999, Inj Prev, V5, P231
[8]   Studying organisational cultures and their effects on safety [J].
Hopkins, Andrew .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2006, 44 (10) :875-889
[9]  
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), 2020, ANN 13 AIRCR ACC INV, V12th
[10]  
Johnson C.W., 2003, Failure in safety-critical systems: A handbook of accident and incident reporting