Latent inhibition in flavor-preference conditioning: Effects of motivational state and the nature of the reinforcer

被引:5
作者
Gonzalez, Felisa [1 ,5 ]
Morillas, Enrique [2 ,5 ]
Hall, Geoffrey [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr CIMCYC, Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Inst Neurosci, Ctr Biomed Res CIBM, Granada, Spain
[3] Univ York, Dept Psychol, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ New S Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Granada, Dept Expt Psychol, E-18071 Granada, Spain
关键词
Latent inhibition; Flavor preference; Fructose; Maltodextrin; Conditioning; Rats; INTRAGASTRIC GLUCOSE; TASTE PREFERENCE; RATS; FRUCTOSE; ASSOCIATIONS; MALTODEXTRIN; ENHANCEMENT; ACCEPTANCE; EXPRESSION; BLOCKING;
D O I
10.3758/s13420-015-0185-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In two experiments, rats received pairings of the flavor of almond with either fructose or maltodextrin, and the conditioned preference for almond was then tested. In each experiment, half of the rats had received prior exposure to almond on its own, and half had received no preexposure. In Experiment 1, in which the rats were hungry during the test, the preference was greater in the nonpreexposed subjects, both for those trained with fructose and those trained with maltodextrin; that is, latent inhibition was obtained with both reinforcers. In Experiment 2, in which the rats were not food deprived prior to the test, not only was there no latent inhibition with either of the reinforcers, but, for both, the preference was greater for preexposed than for nonpreexposed subjects. These results give no support to the proposal that different types of reinforcer generate different types of learning. They are, however, consistent with the proposal that different types of learning control behavior when a rat is hungry and when it is not, and that the form that generates the preference in the latter case is not susceptible to the latent inhibition effect.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 383
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose - Differences in reinforcement potency [J].
Ackroff, K ;
Touzani, K ;
Peets, TK ;
Sclafani, A .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 72 (05) :691-703
[2]   FLAVOR PREFERENCES CONDITIONED BY INTRAGASTRIC INFUSIONS OF DILUTE POLYCOSE SOLUTIONS [J].
ACKROFF, K ;
SCLAFANI, A .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 55 (05) :957-962
[3]   AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXPECTANCY LEARNING AND PREFERENCE CONDITIONING [J].
CAMPBELL, DH ;
CAPALDI, ED ;
SHEFFER, JD ;
BRADFORD, JP .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1988, 19 (02) :162-182
[4]   Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning [J].
De Houwer, J ;
Thomas, S ;
Baeyens, F .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2001, 127 (06) :853-869
[5]   Super-latent inhibition of conditioned taste preference with a long retention interval [J].
De la Casa, L. G. ;
Marquez, R. ;
Lubow, R. E. .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2009, 40 (03) :329-342
[6]   Partial reinforcement and latent inhibition effects on stimulus-outcome associations in flavor preference conditioning [J].
Delamater, Andrew R. .
LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2011, 39 (03) :259-270
[7]   NUTRIENT-CONDITIONED FLAVOR PREFERENCE AND ACCEPTANCE IN RATS - EFFECTS OF DEPRIVATION STATE AND NONREINFORCEMENT [J].
DRUCKER, DB ;
ACKROFF, K ;
SCLAFANI, A .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 56 (04) :701-707
[8]   Microstructural analysis of conditioned and unconditioned responses to maltodextrin [J].
Dwyer, Dominic M. .
LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 36 (02) :149-158
[9]   Context conditional flavor preferences in the rat based on fructose and maltodextrin reinforcers [J].
Dwyer, Dominic M. ;
Quirk, Rachel H. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIORAL PROCESSES, 2008, 34 (02) :294-302
[10]   STARCH-BASED CONDITIONED FLAVOR PREFERENCES IN RATS - INFLUENCE OF TASTE, CALORIES AND CS-US DELAY [J].
ELIZALDE, G ;
SCLAFANI, A .
APPETITE, 1988, 11 (03) :179-200