Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative

被引:180
作者
Huang, Grant D. [1 ]
Bull, Jonca [2 ]
McKee, Kelly Johnston [3 ]
Mahon, Elizabeth [4 ]
Harper, Beth [5 ]
Roberts, Jamie N. [6 ]
机构
[1] US Dept Vet Affairs, Off Res & Dev, Cooperat Studies Program, 810 Vermont Ave NW, Washington, DC 20420 USA
[2] PPDi, 929 North Front St, Wilmington, NC 28401 USA
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[4] Janssen Res & Dev, 700 US Highway 202, Raritan, NJ 08869 USA
[5] Assoc Clin Res Professionals, 99 Canal Ctr Plaza, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[6] Duke Univ, 300 Morgan St, Durham, NC 27701 USA
关键词
Recruitment; Clinical trials; Stakeholder engagement; Retention; Quality by Design; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PATIENT RECRUITMENT; RETENTION; ENGAGEMENT; BARRIERS; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.003
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Patient recruitment is widely recognized as a key determinant of success for clinical trials. Yet a substantial number of trials fail to reach recruitment goals-a situation that has important scientific, financial, ethical, and policy implications. Further, there are important effects on stakeholders who directly contribute to the trial including investigators, sponsors, and study participants. Despite efforts over multiple decades to identify and address barriers, recruitment challenges persist. To advance a more comprehensive approach to trial recruitment, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) convened a project team to examine the challenges and to issue actionable, evidence-based recommendations for improving recruitment planning that extend beyond common study-specific strategies. We describe our multi-stakeholder effort to develop a framework that delineates three areas essential to strategic recruitment planning efforts: (1) trial design and protocol development, (2) trial feasibility and site selection, and (3) communication. Our recommendations propose an upstream approach to recruitment planning that has the potential to produce greater impact and reduce downstream barriers. Additionally, we offer tools to help facilitate adoption of the recommendations. We hope that our framework and recommendations will serve as a guide for initial efforts in clinical trial recruitment planning irrespective of disease or intervention focus, provide a common basis for discussions in this area and generate targets for further analysis and continual improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 79
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre [J].
Adams, Mary ;
Caffrey, Louise ;
McKevitt, Christopher .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 13
[2]   Community Engagement in Research: Frameworks for Education and Peer Review [J].
Ahmed, Syed M. ;
Palermo, Ann-Gel S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 100 (08) :1380-1387
[3]  
American Society for Quality, 7 BAS QUAL TOOLS PRO
[4]  
Anderson DL., 2001, A Guide To Patient Recruitment
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SUBJECT RECRUITMENT
[6]   A systematic review of models to predict recruitment to multicentre clinical trials [J].
Barnard, Katharine D. ;
Dent, Louise ;
Cook, Andrew .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
[7]  
Bielski RJ, 1997, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V33, P75
[8]   Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities [J].
Bower, Peter ;
Brueton, Valerie ;
Gamble, Carrol ;
Treweek, Shaun ;
Smith, Catrin Tudur ;
Young, Bridget ;
Williamson, Paula .
TRIALS, 2014, 15
[9]   Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: An empirical analysis of recently closed trials [J].
Carlisle, Benjamin ;
Kimmelman, Jonathan ;
Ramsay, Tim ;
MacKinnon, Nathalie .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 12 (01) :77-83
[10]  
Caruso S., INCREASING PATIENT E