Comparison of different chemoradiotherapy regimens for the preoperative treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Yu, Zhengyi [1 ]
Wang, Jiawei [1 ]
Xu, Lingyan [1 ]
Liu, Jin [2 ]
Chen, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Gu, Yanhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Oncol, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Clin Med Res Inst, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chemoradiotherapy; locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); neoadjuvant treatment; network meta-analysis; preoperative treatment; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; RADIATION-THERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; CONCURRENT RADIOTHERAPY; GERMAN CAO/ARO/AIO-04; END-POINTS; OPEN-LABEL; OXALIPLATIN; CAPECITABINE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.21037/tcr-20-683
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The efficacy of different neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens on locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains confusing. We evaluated them together via a network meta-analysis in terms of survival benefits to find the optimal treatment. Methods: We searched , EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the ClinicalTrials website according to the selection criteria for eligible publications before Oct 25, 2019. Pathological complete response rate (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed based on Bayesian methods in the meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-five articles containing 7,142 participants and 12 preoperative regimens were analyzed. In terms of pCR, radiation therapy plus 5-fluorouracil (RT+5-Fu), RT plus capecitabine (RT+CAPE), RT plus 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (RT+FOLFOX), RT plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (RT+XELOX), and RT plus S-1 and irinotecan (RT+IS) were better than RT alone [odds ratio (OR) =2.66, 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.38-5.01; OR =3.11, 95% CrI: 1.33-6.98; OR =4.03, 95% CrI: 1.77-9.47; OR =4.22, 95% CrI: 1.60-10.87; OR =4.55, 95% CrI: 1.11-18.88, respectively] and RT+FOLFOX and RT+XELOX were superior to FOLFOX (OR =4.58, 95% CrI: 1.57-14.19; OR =4.81, 95% CrI: 1.20-18.73), too. Benefits could be seen on comparing RT+CAPE, RT+FOLFOX, and RT+XELOX with RT (OR =0.84, 95% CrI: 0.73-0.97; OR =0.88, 95% CrI: 0.80-0.97; OR =0.79, 95% CrI: 0.66-0.95, respectively) in DFS. RT+XELOX seemed to have better effects on OS compared than RT+5-Fu and RT+CAPF, (OR =0.78, 95% CrI: 0.61-1.(X); OR =0.86, 95% CrI: 0.74-1.00, respectively). Moreover, according to surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis, RT+XELOX had the best outcomes in terms of pCR (79.18%) and OS (83.49%) and RT plus capecitabine, irinotecan, and cetuximab (RT+XELIRI+CET) ranked first with respect to DFS (87.86%). Conclusions: RT+XELOX is likely to be the best treatment with a comprehensive curative effect and the standard treatment of 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy has some advantages, as well. More relevant evidence is needed for clinicians' guidance.
引用
收藏
页码:4857 / 4869
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Neoadjuvant 5-FU or Capecitabine Plus Radiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial
    Allegra, Carmen J.
    Yothers, Greg
    O'Connell, Michael J.
    Beart, Robert W.
    Wozniak, Timothy F.
    Pitot, Henry C.
    Shields, Anthony F.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    Ryan, David P.
    Arora, Amit
    Evans, Lisa S.
    Bahary, Nathan
    Soori, Gamini
    Eakle, Janice F.
    Robertson, John M.
    Moore, Dennis F., Jr.
    Mullane, Michael R.
    Marchello, Benjamin T.
    Ward, Patrick J.
    Sharif, Saima
    Roh, Mark S.
    Wolmark, Norman
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (11):
  • [2] Primary Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Pathologic Results of the STAR-01 Randomized Phase III Trial
    Aschele, Carlo
    Cionini, Luca
    Lonardi, Sara
    Pinto, Carmine
    Cordio, Stefano
    Rosati, Gerardo
    Artale, Salvatore
    Tagliagambe, Angiolo
    Ambrosini, Giovanni
    Rosetti, Paola
    Bonetti, Andrea
    Negru, Maria Emanuela
    Tronconi, Maria Chiara
    Luppi, Gabriele
    Silvano, Giovanni
    Corsi, Domenico Cristiano
    Bochicchio, Anna Maria
    Chiaulon, Germana
    Gallo, Maurizio
    Boni, Luca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (20) : 2773 - 2780
  • [3] Late toxicities and clinical outcome at 5 years of the ACCORD 12/0405-PRODIGE 02 trial comparing two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for intermediate-risk rectal cancer
    Azria, D.
    Doyen, J.
    Jarlier, M.
    Martel-Lafay, I.
    Hennequin, C.
    Etienne, P.
    Vendrely, V.
    Francois, E.
    de la Roche, G.
    Bouche, O.
    Mirabel, X.
    Denis, B.
    Mineur, L.
    Berdah, J.
    Mahe, M.
    Becouran, Y.
    Dupuis, O.
    Lledo, G.
    Seitz, J.
    Bedenne, L.
    Gourgou-Bourgade, S.
    Juzyna, B.
    Conroy, T.
    Gerard, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (10) : 2436 - 2442
  • [4] Bernardinelli L, BAYESIAN ANAL SPACE, DOI DOI 10.1002/SIM.4780142112
  • [5] Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer
    Bosset, Jean-Francois
    Collette, Laurence
    Calais, Gilles
    Mineur, Laurent
    Maingon, Philippe
    Radosevic-Jelic, Ljiljana
    Daban, Alain
    Bardet, Etienne
    Beny, Alexander
    Ollier, Jean-Claude
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (11) : 1114 - 1123
  • [6] BOULISWASSIF S, 1984, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V53, P1811, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840501)53:9<1811::AID-CNCR2820530902>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-H
  • [8] Randomized phase III study comparing preoperative radiotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer
    Braendengen, Morten
    Tveit, Kjell M.
    Berglund, Ake
    Birkemeyer, Elke
    Frykholm, Gunilla
    Pahlman, Lars
    Wiig, Johan N.
    Bystrom, Per
    Bujko, Krzysztof
    Glimelius, Bengt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (22) : 3687 - 3694
  • [9] General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
    Brooks, SP
    Gelman, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (04) : 434 - 455
  • [10] METAANALYSIS FOR 2X2 TABLES - A BAYESIAN-APPROACH
    CARLIN, JB
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (02) : 141 - 158