The Multiattribute Linear Ballistic Accumulator Model of Context Effects in Multialternative Choice

被引:186
作者
Trueblood, Jennifer S. [1 ]
Brown, Scott D. [2 ]
Heathcote, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
decision making; multialternative choice; preference reversal; context effects; dynamic models; DECISION FIELD-THEORY; PHANTOM ALTERNATIVES; ASYMMETRIC DOMINANCE; VISUAL-SEARCH; LOSS AVERSION; TIME; DECOY; SIMILARITY; RECOGNITION; ATTRACTION;
D O I
10.1037/a0036137
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Context effects occur when a choice between 2 options is altered by adding a 3rd alternative. Three major context effects-similarity, compromise, and attraction-have wide-ranging implications across applied and theoretical domains, and have driven the development of new dynamic models of multiattribute and multialternative choice. We propose the multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator (MLBA), a new dynamic model that provides a quantitative account of all 3 context effects. Our account applies not only to traditional paradigms involving choices among hedonic stimuli, but also to recent demonstrations of context effects with nonhedonic stimuli. Because of its computational tractability, the MLBA model is more easily applied than previous dynamic models. We show that the model also accounts for a range of other phenomena in multiattribute, multialternative choice, including time pressure effects, and that it makes a new prediction about the relationship between deliberation time and the magnitude of the similarity effect, which we confirm experimentally.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 205
页数:27
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The wave theory of difference and similarity
[4]  
Ashby FG, 2000, J MATH PSYCHOL, V44, P310, DOI 10.1006/jmps.1999.1249
[5]   Rigorously Testing Multialternative Decision Field Theory Against Random Utility Models [J].
Berkowitsch, Nicolas A. J. ;
Scheibehenne, Benjamin ;
Rieskamp, Joerg .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2014, 143 (03) :1331-1348
[6]   Associations and the Accumulation of Preference [J].
Bhatia, Sudeep .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2013, 120 (03) :522-543
[7]   A ballistic model of choice response time [J].
Brown, S ;
Heathcote, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 112 (01) :117-128
[8]   The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation [J].
Brown, Scott D. ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (03) :153-178
[9]   An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification [J].
Brown, Scott D. ;
Marley, A. A. J. ;
Donkin, Christopher ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (02) :396-425
[10]   Model comparisons and model selections based on generalization criterion methodology [J].
Busemeyer, JR ;
Wang, YM .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 44 (01) :171-189