Deriving health utilities from the MacNew Heart Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire

被引:22
作者
Chen, Gang [1 ]
Mckie, John [2 ]
Khan, Munir A. [2 ]
Richardson, Jeff R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Quality of life; multi-attribute utility; MacNew Heart Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire; heart disease; mapping; DISABILITY; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1177/1474515114536096
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Quality of life is included in the economic evaluation of health services by measuring the preference for health states, i.e. health state utilities. However, most intervention studies include a disease-specific, not a utility, instrument. Consequently, there has been increasing use of statistical mapping algorithms which permit utilities to be estimated from a disease-specific instrument. The present paper provides such algorithms between the MacNew Heart Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (MacNew) instrument and six multi-attribute utility (MAU) instruments, the Euroqol (EQ-5D), the Short Form 6D (SF-6D), the Health Utilities Index (HUI) 3, the Quality of Wellbeing (QWB), the 15D (15 Dimension) and the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-8D). Methods: Heart disease patients and members of the healthy public were recruited from six countries. Non-parametric rank tests were used to compare subgroup utilities and MacNew scores. Mapping algorithms were estimated using three separate statistical techniques. Results: Mapping algorithms achieved a high degree of precision. Based on the mean absolute error and the intra class correlation the preferred mapping is MacNew into SF-6D or 15D. Using the R squared statistic the preferred mapping is MacNew into AQoL-8D. Implications for research: The algorithms reported in this paper enable MacNew data to be mapped into utilities predicted from any of six instruments. This permits studies which have included the MacNew to be used in cost utility analyses which, in turn, allows the comparison of services with interventions across the health system.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 415
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Allender S., 2008, EUROPEAN CARDIOVASCU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1964, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V2, P177
[3]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292
[4]  
Brazier J., 2007, MEASURING VALUING HL
[5]   A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures [J].
Brazier, John E. ;
Yang, Yaling ;
Tsuchiya, Aki ;
Rowen, Donna Louise .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 11 (02) :215-225
[6]   Mapping analyses to estimate health utilities based on responses to the OM8-30 otitis media questionnaire [J].
Dakin, Helen ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Haggard, Mark ;
Benge, Sarah ;
Williamson, Ian .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (01) :65-80
[7]   The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: Reference data for users [J].
Dixon, T ;
Lim, LLY ;
Oldridge, NB .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (02) :173-183
[8]   Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system [J].
Feeny, D ;
Furlong, W ;
Torrance, GW ;
Goldsmith, CH ;
Zhu, ZL ;
DePauw, S ;
Denton, M ;
Boyle, M .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) :113-128
[9]   Decomposing cross-country differences in quality adjusted life expectancy: the impact of value sets [J].
Heijink, Richard ;
van Baal, Pieter ;
Oppe, Mark ;
Koolman, Xander ;
Westert, Gert .
POPULATION HEALTH METRICS, 2011, 9
[10]   Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement [J].
Husereau, Don ;
Drummond, Michael ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Carswell, Chris ;
Moher, David ;
Greenberg, Dan ;
Augustovski, Federico ;
Briggs, Andrew H. ;
Mauskopf, Josephine ;
Loder, Elizabeth .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (02) :E1-E5