Long-term outcomes of penile prostheses for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

被引:1
作者
Trost, Landon W. [1 ,2 ]
McCaslin, Ross [1 ]
Linder, Brian [2 ]
Hellstrom, Wayne J. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
erectile dysfunction; inflatable penile prostheses; malleable; Peyronie's disease; surgery; two piece; PEYRONIES-DISEASE; MECHANICAL RELIABILITY; CORPOREAL RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; OPTICAL CORPOROTOMY; IMMEDIATE INSERTION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; REVISION SURGERY; IMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1586/ERD.12.92
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Since their introduction 60 years ago, penile prostheses have remained the standard therapy for the management of refractory erectile dysfunction, with multiple long-term series reporting outcomes. A PubMed search was performed from 1990 to present, and outcomes of penile prosthetics were reviewed. Studies with < 12 months follow-up were excluded. Overall mechanical survival of three-piece prostheses range from 81-94, 68-89 and 57-76% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Contemporary infection rates following recent device modifications are 1-2% (low risk) to 2-3% (high risk). Patient satisfaction ranges from 75-100% and varies by prosthetic device. Outcomes are further reviewed among specialized populations (revision surgery, Peyronie's disease, priapism, corporal fibrosis and neurologic impairments). Penile prostheses remain a viable surgical treatment option with excellent mechanical reliability, low infection rates and significant patient/partner satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 366
页数:14
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure [J].
Abouassaly, Robert ;
Angermeier, Kenneth W. ;
Montague, D. K. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (06) :2471-2473
[2]   An audit of implanted penile prostheses in the UK [J].
Agrawal, Vineet ;
Ralph, David .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 98 (02) :393-395
[3]   Mechanical failure with malleable penile prosthesis [J].
Akand, Murat ;
Ozayar, Asim ;
Yaman, Onder ;
Demirel, Cihan .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (05) :1007.e11-1007.e12
[4]   Clinical experience with inflatable and malleable penile implants in 104 patients [J].
Anafarta, K ;
Safak, M ;
Beduk, Y ;
Baltaci, S ;
Aydos, K .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1996, 56 (02) :100-104
[5]   SURGICAL TREATMENT OF IMPOTENCE [J].
BEHERI, GE .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1966, 38 (02) :92-&
[6]   The prosthesis salvage operation: Immediate replacement of the infected penile prosthesis [J].
Brant, MD ;
Ludlow, JK ;
Mulcahy, JJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (01) :155-157
[7]   A Preliminary Report on Combined Penoscrotal and Perineal Approach for Placement of Penile Prosthesis with Corporal Fibrosis [J].
Brusky, John P. ;
Tran, Viet Q. ;
Rieder, Jocelyn M. ;
Aboseif, Sherif R. .
ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2008, 2008
[8]   Fifteen years experience of penile prosthesis insertion [J].
Burns-Cox, N ;
Burston, A ;
Gingell, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 1997, 9 (04) :211-216
[9]   Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: Results of a long-term multicenter study [J].
Carson, CC ;
Mulcahy, JJ ;
Govier, FE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02) :376-380
[10]   Efficacy of antibiotic impregnation of inflatable penile prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants [J].
Carson, CC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) :1611-1614