Evaluation of the Defay-Prigogine model for the membrane interphase in relation to biological response in membrane-protein interactions

被引:14
|
作者
Disalvo, Edgardo A. [1 ,2 ]
Hollmann, Axel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Semorile, Liliana [3 ]
Florencia Martini, M. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago del Estero, Lab Biointerfaces & Biomimet Syst, CITSE, RA-4200 Santiago Del Estero, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Quilmes, Inst Basic & Appl Microbiol, Mol Microbiol Lab, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Pharm & Biochem, Dept Pharmaceut Technol, RA-1113 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源
关键词
Lipid membranes; Water-membrane-interphases; Monolayer surface pressure; Interfacial water activity; Protein interaction; LIPID-MEMBRANES; LAYER PROTEINS; WATER; MONOLAYERS; PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; CHOLESTEROL; HYDRATION; BILAYERS; PERMEABILITY; MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.03.026
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Surface water activity appears as a common factor when the interaction of several aqueous soluble and surface active proteins with lipid membranes of different compositions is measured by the changes in surface pressure of a lipid monolayer. The perturbation of the lipid surface caused by aqueous soluble proteins depends on the composition of the hydrocarbon phases, either modified by unsaturated bonds in the acyl chains or by inclusion of cholesterol. The cut-off (critical) surface pressure in monolayers, at which no effect of the proteins is found, is related to the composition of the head group region. The perturbation of surface pressure is produced by proteins when the area per lipid is above just 4% larger than that corresponding to the hydration shell of the phospholipid head groups found in the cut-off. This area excess gives place to regions in which the chemical potential of water changes with respect to bulk water. According to the Defay-Prigogine relation this interfacial water activity is the reason of the surface pressure increase induced by aqueous soluble proteins injected in the subphase. As predicted by solution chemistry, the increase of surface pressure is independent of the protein nature but depends on the water surface state determined by the lipid composition. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1834 / 1839
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Membrane-protein interactions in cell signaling and membrane trafficking
    Cho, WH
    Stahelin, RV
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 2005, 34 : 119 - 151
  • [2] HELIX INTERACTIONS IN MEMBRANE-PROTEIN STRUCTURE
    ENGELMAN, DM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1995, 5 (10): : 1848 - 1849
  • [3] Cryoem Studies of Membrane-Protein Interactions
    Mizuno, Naoko
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 104 (02) : 206A - 207A
  • [4] Membrane-protein interactions in mechanosensitive channels
    Wiggins, P
    Phillips, R
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 88 (02) : 880 - 902
  • [5] Modeling Membrane Curvature Generation due to Membrane-Protein Interactions
    Alimohamadi, Haleh
    Rangamani, Padmini
    BIOMOLECULES, 2018, 8 (04)
  • [6] The role of protein and surfactant interactions in membrane-protein crystallization
    Berger, BW
    Gendron, CM
    Rlobinson, CR
    Kaler, EW
    Lenhoff, AM
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 61 : 724 - 730
  • [7] Reshaping biological membranes in endocytosis: crossing the configurational space of membrane-protein interactions
    Simunovic, Mijo
    Bassereau, Patricia
    BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 395 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [8] Lipid insertion driven membrane-protein: Interactions
    de Kruijff, B
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 76 (01) : A4 - A4
  • [9] Phase behavior and interactions of the membrane-protein bacteriorhodopsin
    Koltover, I
    Raedler, JO
    Salditt, T
    Rothschild, KJ
    Safinya, CR
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1999, 82 (15) : 3184 - 3187
  • [10] Lipid bilayers: membrane-protein electrostatic interactions
    Cafiso, David S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1991, 1 (02) : 185 - 190