Threat Reduces Value-Driven but Not Salience-Driven Attentional Capture

被引:26
作者
Kim, Andy Jeesu [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Brian A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Texas A&M Inst Neurosci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
selective attention; attentional capture; reward learning; threat; anxiety; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; TOP-DOWN; BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION; DECISION-MAKING; NONDRUG REWARD; BASAL GANGLIA; VISUAL-SEARCH; DRUG CUES;
D O I
10.1037/emo0000599
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What we direct our attention to is strongly influenced by both bottom-up and top-down processes. Moreover, the control of attention is biased by prior learning, such that attention is automatically captured by stimuli previously associated with either reward or threat. It is unknown whether value-oriented and threat-oriented mechanisms of selective information processing function independently of one another, or whether they interact with each other in the selection process. Here, we introduced the threat of electric shock into the value-driven attentional capture paradigm to examine whether the experience of threat influences the attention capturing quality of previously reward-associated stimuli. The results showed that value-driven attentional capture was blunted by the experience of threat. This contrasts with previous reports of threat potentiating attentional capture by physically salient stimuli, which we replicate here. Our findings demonstrate that threat selectively interferes with value-based but not salience-based attentional priority, consistent with a competitive relationship between value-based and threat-based information processing.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 889
页数:16
相关论文
共 146 条
[21]   The capture of attention and gaze in the search for emotional photographic faces [J].
Becker, Stefanie I. ;
Dutt, Neelam ;
Vromen, Joyce M. G. ;
Horstmann, Gernot .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2017, 25 (1-3) :241-261
[22]   Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search [J].
Bichot, NP ;
Schall, JD .
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 16 (01) :81-89
[23]   DEFENSE SYSTEM PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY - AN ETHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE PHARMACOLOGY OF FEAR AND ANXIETY [J].
BLANCHARD, RJ ;
YUDKO, EB ;
RODGERS, RJ ;
BLANCHARD, DC .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1993, 58 (1-2) :155-165
[24]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[25]   Influence and Limitations of Popout in the Selection of Salient Visual Stimuli by Area V4 Neurons [J].
Burrows, Brittany E. ;
Moore, Tirin .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (48) :15169-15177
[26]   Drug Stroop performance: Relationships with primary substance of use and treatment outcome in a drug-dependent outpatient sample [J].
Carpenter, KM ;
Schreiber, E ;
Church, S ;
McDowell, D .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2006, 31 (01) :174-181
[27]   BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].
CARVER, CS ;
WHITE, TL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333
[28]  
Chubala C, 2009, CAN J EXP PSYCHOL, V63, P339
[29]   Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review [J].
Cisler, Josh M. ;
Koster, Ernst H. W. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) :203-216
[30]   Risk-avoidant decision making increased by threat of electric shock [J].
Clark, Luke ;
Li, Ruoran ;
Wright, Chelsea M. ;
Rome, Farima ;
Fairchild, Graeme ;
Dunn, Barnaby D. ;
Aitken, Michael R. F. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 (10) :1436-1443