Threat Reduces Value-Driven but Not Salience-Driven Attentional Capture

被引:26
作者
Kim, Andy Jeesu [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Brian A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Texas A&M Inst Neurosci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
selective attention; attentional capture; reward learning; threat; anxiety; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; TOP-DOWN; BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION; DECISION-MAKING; NONDRUG REWARD; BASAL GANGLIA; VISUAL-SEARCH; DRUG CUES;
D O I
10.1037/emo0000599
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What we direct our attention to is strongly influenced by both bottom-up and top-down processes. Moreover, the control of attention is biased by prior learning, such that attention is automatically captured by stimuli previously associated with either reward or threat. It is unknown whether value-oriented and threat-oriented mechanisms of selective information processing function independently of one another, or whether they interact with each other in the selection process. Here, we introduced the threat of electric shock into the value-driven attentional capture paradigm to examine whether the experience of threat influences the attention capturing quality of previously reward-associated stimuli. The results showed that value-driven attentional capture was blunted by the experience of threat. This contrasts with previous reports of threat potentiating attentional capture by physically salient stimuli, which we replicate here. Our findings demonstrate that threat selectively interferes with value-based but not salience-based attentional priority, consistent with a competitive relationship between value-based and threat-based information processing.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 889
页数:16
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]   Voluntary attention increases perceived spatial frequency [J].
Abrams, Jared ;
Barbot, Antoine ;
Carrasco, Marisa .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (06) :1510-1521
[2]   Selective attention moderates the relationship between attentional capture by signals of nondrug reward and illicit drug use [J].
Albertella, Lucy ;
Copeland, Jan ;
Pearson, Daniel ;
Watson, Poppy ;
Wiers, Reinout W. ;
Le Pelley, Mike E. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2017, 175 :99-105
[3]   Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kim, Haena .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 51 (02) :720-726
[4]   Reward processing in the value-driven attention network: reward signals tracking cue identity and location [J].
Anderson, Brian A. .
SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 12 (03) :461-467
[5]   What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases? [J].
Anderson, Brian A. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2016, 167 :8-14
[6]   Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV plus individuals [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kronemer, Sharif I. ;
Rilee, Jessica J. ;
Sacktor, Ned ;
Marvel, Cherie L. .
NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE, 2016, 92 :157-165
[7]   The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection [J].
Anderson, Brian A. .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 1369 :24-39
[8]   The Role of Dopamine in Value-Based Attentional Orienting [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Kuwabara, Hiroto ;
Wong, Dean F. ;
Gean, Emily G. ;
Rahmim, Arman ;
Brasic, James R. ;
George, Noble ;
Frolov, Boris ;
Courtney, Susan M. ;
Yantis, Steven .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) :550-555
[9]   Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2014, 1587 :88-96
[10]   Attentional Bias for Nondrug Reward Is Magnified in Addiction [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Faulkner, Monica L. ;
Rilee, Jessica J. ;
Yantis, Steven ;
Marvel, Cherie L. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 21 (06) :499-506