Organizational evaluation of an interprofessional study unit - Results from a Danish case study

被引:8
作者
Jensen, Didde Cramer [1 ]
Norgaard, Birgitte [2 ]
Draborg, Eva [3 ]
Vestergaard, Erik [2 ]
Odgaard, Eva [4 ]
Sorensen, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Denmark, Ctr Appl Hlth Serv Res & Technol Assessment CAST, Odense, Denmark
[2] Kolding Cty Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[3] Univ So Denmark, Ctr Hlth Econ Res, COHERE, Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Coll Lillebaelt, Vejle, Denmark
关键词
Case study; evaluation research; qualitative method; interprofessional education; interprofessional evaluation; interprofessional care; education; EDUCATION; FRAMEWORK; CONTEXT; CARE;
D O I
10.3109/13561820.2012.715097
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article presents results from an organizational evaluation of an interprofessional clinical study unit (ICS) in Denmark. The aim of this study was to test whether the ICS was based on a durable organizational concept and to identify the prerequisites for the unit to be successful. The evaluation framework was "theory-based evaluation". A program theory was developed based on the concepts and expectations of the steering committee which initiated and designed the ICS. The program theory was tested for conflicts of interest among the stakeholders related to the ICS regarding prerequisites for the study unit to function organizationally. Further analysis examined whether these conditions had been present during the project period and whether all elements had been correctly implemented. The results suggested that although the ICS had taken into account stakeholders' requests, it was not possible to fully implement all the necessary conditions identified as essential for the unit to function successfully. The results generate a set of recommendations for future ICS units to function successfully.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, J RES INTERPROF PRAC, DOI DOI 10.22230/JRIPE.2010V1N3A26
  • [3] Baerg K., 2012, Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education, V2, P187
  • [4] Berry D., 2007, Health communication: Theory and practice
  • [5] Borrill C., 2000, BRIT J HLTH CARE, V6, P364, DOI DOI 10.12968/BJHC.2000.6.8.19300
  • [6] Burtonwood A M, 2001, J Interprof Care, V15, P383
  • [7] Cashman Suzanne, 2004, J Interprof Care, V18, P183, DOI 10.1080/13561820410001686936
  • [8] Chen H.-T., 2005, ENCY EVALUATION, P415, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412950558.N542
  • [9] Curran Vernon R, 2005, J Interprof Care, V19 Suppl 1, P76, DOI 10.1080/13561820500081802
  • [10] Dombeck M.-T., 1997, Journal of Interprofessional Care, V11, P9