How Do Politicians Capture a State? Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises

被引:12
作者
Szarzec, Katarzyna [1 ]
Totleben, Bartosz [1 ]
Piatek, Dawid [1 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Econ & Business, Dept Macroecon & Dev Studies, Poznan, Poland
关键词
political state capture; party patronage; state-owned enterprises; post-socialist countries; rent-seeking; corporate governance; RENT-SEEKING; PARTY PATRONAGE; PERFORMANCE; TRANSITION; INSTITUTIONS; CONNECTIONS; CORRUPTION; OWNERSHIP; ECONOMY; CLIENTELISM;
D O I
10.1177/0888325420953485
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
This article discusses political state capture in the context of party patronage. Evidence of this is delivered from state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and the rotations of members of their management and supervisory boards. In this case, it is deemed that an interest group, which consists of politicians and representatives in the government administration, decides about the appointment and dismissal of board members through the corporate governance of SOEs and ownership policy of the state. We analyzed the scale and intensity of rotations in Poland of about twelve thousand joint-stock companies in the years 2001-2017 according to their ownership structure. We show that changes of managers and supervisory board members in state-owned enterprises are higher than in private companies and are related to political elections. We estimated that on average three months after a new government is formed, a peak of changes in the composition of boards is observed, though they are earlier in the case of a supervisory board. We conclude that this can be regarded as an example of state capture by politicians.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 172
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Studies on Institution Designing of Board of Directors for State-owned Enterprises
    Wang Guoliang
    [J]. EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 446 - 449
  • [32] Coping with the Leviathan: Minority shareholders in state-owned enterprises - evidence from Italy
    Colli, Andrea
    [J]. BUSINESS HISTORY, 2013, 55 (02) : 190 - 214
  • [33] Monitoring incentives and tax planning-Evidence from State-Owned enterprises
    Eberhartinger, Eva
    Samuel, David M. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2025, 51
  • [34] The impact of high-pressure political reforms on state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China
    Bae, Sung C.
    Kwon, Taek Ho
    Liu, Chenyang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 91
  • [35] Do State-owned Enterprises Underperform Compared to Privately owned Companies? An Examination of the Largest Polish Enterprises
    Kabacinski, Bartosz
    Kubiak, Jaroslaw
    Szarzec, Katarzyna
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2020, 56 (13) : 3174 - 3192
  • [36] The effects of state ownership on innovation: evidence from the state-owned enterprises reform in China
    Zhan, Jinyong
    Zhu, Jingci
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (01) : 145 - 163
  • [37] How does State Equity Participation Contribute to Performance of State-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia?
    Maimunah, Siti
    Winarningsih, Srihadi
    Farida, Ida
    [J]. CUADERNOS DE ECONOMIA-SPAIN, 2022, 45 (127): : 32 - 43
  • [38] The Financial Sustainability of State-Owned Enterprises in an Emerging Economy
    Lee, Chee Loong
    Ahmad, Riayati
    Lee, Wing Shing
    Khalid, Norlin
    Karim, Zulkefly Abdul
    [J]. ECONOMIES, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [39] State-owned enterprises as knowledge-explorer agents
    Benassi, Mario
    Landoni, Matteo
    [J]. INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2019, 26 (02) : 218 - 241
  • [40] Assessment of State-Owned Enterprises from Romania
    Meghisan, Georgeta-Madalina
    [J]. ISSUES AND INNOVATIVE TRENDS IN SUSTAINABLE GROWTH - STRATEGY CHALLENGES FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL POLICIES, PT 1, 2018, : 373 - 388